When something is really solved (a solution exists without negative side-effects; and this fact has been verified several times), they should indeed look for new problems.
When something is really solved (a solution exists without negative side-effects; and this fact has been verified several times), they should indeed look for new problems.
I (non-scientist, applying Occam’s razor and the principle of “if it seems too good to be true, it surely is”) conclude there is probably a fundamental flaw, like, perhaps, after a few years of “improvement” people suddenly shrivel up into a husk.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?linkname=pubmed_pubmed&from...
By becoming a meta-researcher like me, you observe how beautiful and futuristic the world could be. And you also observe that the revolution people are waiting for has been discovered in the 90s and that it will never be used.
As an aside, may I suggest to you that in a forum with many Americans, use of the word “retarded” will usually get you a very strongly negative reaction and obliterate consideration of any other points you may be making.