Now that digital is ‘refragmenting’ it would be funny if the red disks came back to get around all these silos.
Now that digital is ‘refragmenting’ it would be funny if the red disks came back to get around all these silos.
I'm not an IP law expert, but does anyone know why fragmentation isn't such a problem with music? You never hear someone complaining that they have to subscribe to eight different music streaming services to hear all the popular songs. It seems the big music streaming services all have pretty much all the popular artists and you can just pick one and listen to all the hits, regardless of which label they're on.
Why isn't it this way for video content?
Same way that a bunch of studios waited for their Netflix/Prime contracts to wind down before opening their own streaming service.
It’s different but similar around the world, but there is no long term rights securitization going on.
1. Exclusives were very expensive and not linked to growing subscribers. This is true within the other services but can be seen publicly by the failure of Tidal.
2. Frank Ocean screwed Universal Music (well played), resulting in the CEO declaring an end to exclusives [0].
[0]: https://www.billboard.com/music/music-news/frank-ocean-endle...
I'm not an IP law expert, but does anyone know why fragmentation isn't such a problem with music? You never hear someone complaining that they have to subscribe to eight different music streaming services to hear all the popular songs. It seems the big music streaming services all have pretty much all the popular artists.
Why isn't it this way for video content?
You also get a lot of productions that are financed in-house. Few HBO properties are going to be available on Netflix and vice-versa. The filmmakers had no choice but sign with someone, giving them access to a particular subscriber base at the expense of the broader market.