>Have you ever thought of hiding a photo inside another photo?
No? Is there any use for this besides people sharing Child Sexual Abuse imagery without being detected?
No? Is there any use for this besides people sharing Child Sexual Abuse imagery without being detected?
That's like inventing a "remote roadside detonation device" and claiming it will only be used for parades to activate confetti payloads. It's naive.
You could do something like Eurion and hide a pattern that only copiers can identify. Or do the same as color printers and encode hardware and user information as a pattern.
DOOM 2016 hid satanic images in its sound files instead of other images, of course that was only an easter egg and not really useful outside of confirming that computer games are evil.
Hiding one thing inside another doesn't necessarily require secrecy as part of the intent.
Besides complaining about the potential use for child pornography is bizarre. If someone wanted to secretly send child porn to someone else, they could just encrypt it. It would be far more effective than this image packing method.
You're making a case against steganography?
Or without leaving the country you might want to hide pictures of animal abuse if you took them without permission from the owner, in some places documenting animal abuse is even more illegal than committing it. Look at all those funny cat pictures, no cows rotting in their own shit to see officer.