Twitter admits overstating audience figures for 3 years
ft.com
ft.com
https://www.warc.com/newsandopinion/news/ny-based-newsday%E2...
On the other hand, for twitter's main use case, do twitter user counts even matter? It's mostly just a direct channel for famous people to the mainstream media.
I haven't verified the numbers yet. The conspiracy theory is now that Twitter is changing hands, they're quickly ending certain practices that limit reach and influence of some individuals. Is there any truth to this? If so, how is this being done?
I did notice a lot of tweets that I believe would have been banned just a short time ago (you can guess what they're about). Is there any evidence of a policy change or change in enforcement?
But I am rethinking my decision now.
Twitter's changing hands is unlikely to change that: tech folks I would otherwise follow are still going to insist while talking about javascript that I concern myself with issues of skin color, religion, ethnicity, sex, gender, war, etc.
Whereas I'm just here for the Svelte or whatever.
That was Twitter’s official explanation.. and it makes sense to me.
My friends are mostly left leaning and I can confirm some expressed sentiment about no longer using Twitter.
https://uk.style.yahoo.com/twitter-says-overcounted-users-ov...