Atomic Habits: An Easy and Proven Way to Build Good Habits and Break Bad Ones
jamesclear.com
jamesclear.com
I read Atomic Habits and, while reading, wrote 150 lines of a .txt file summarising the best parts. I still find it useful today.
I’ve only read the first few chapters so far, but the one idea that really helped me is the importance of incorporating your habit into your identity.
Eg, if you think “I am learning piano and will try to practice every day,” it doesn’t stick nearly as much as convincing yourself “I AM a piano player, and I practice every day”.
Also reminded me of this passage from War of Art...
"What's hard is sitting down to write. Have you experienced a vision of the person you might become, the work you could accomplish, the realized being you were meant to be? Are you a writer who doesn't write, a painter who doesn't paint, an entrepreneur who never starts a venture? Then you know what “Resistance” is."
I assume most people intuitively know the ideas in it beforehand.
Buy it only if you get it cheap. Or buy used.
After reading a bunch of such books over the years, I have sworn never to read books about personal productivity.
Thanks for that! I've wasted far too many hours of my life on books like this that could easily have conveyed all their useful information in a couple of pages.
I had the distinct feeling it might be that sort of book from the vapid, content-free nature of the linked blog post, but to have it confirmed by someone who's actually bothered to look at the source is valuable.
Here you go: https://www.chrisbehan.ca/posts/atomic-habits
Related HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29774859
Which would have drowned it in the ocean where drops are posts.
_We do "need" (it would be a revolution in civilization) a system to review contributions - including posts - ranking them for value._
Something that would allow such «blog post» to have a recognition - closer to "best seller" class and farther to "found it randomly".
That's every self help book ever. I've read a few a while ago and don't read them anymore. Past the intro and maybe the first or second chapter it's a collection of anecdotes to fill 100~200 pages.
It's the stories and the emotions that are evoked when reading, that trigger profound changes in my mind.
I have no time to waste reading any of the millions of random trivial "do this, do that" lists. They have no relation to me. Why should I follow them?
If you takeaway a valuable idea, what’s that worth to you? The time I spend reading a book is far more valuable than whatever the cost of the actual book is. I can’t imagine factoring a discount into the decision making process.
In this particular case though, I feel reading that book was mostly a waste of time primarily, and of money secondarily. But then, me being me I would probably have wasted that time doing other mundane tasks anyway.
Also, some books are worth far more than their actual cost. For instance, I've been reading the classic Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte. My regret is that I choose a paperback instead of the hardcover, because this is one book I want to keep for a very long time. (My paperback copy is absolutely fine at the moment, but hardcovers tend to outlast them).
This is the "problem". You've read a lot of similar books so this one isn't groundbreaking. But if you were one of today's 10000, this one would be groundbreaking.
- Habit stacking: want to form a new habit? Stick it on the end of an existing one. Works really well.
It's a decent book and worth the read IMO.
That is false.
Maybe you can, but if you don't know you should then this book helps.
So let’s move the conversation forward a step: does this book or any like it have (even slightly) rigorous evidence of positive impact? If the FDA wanted to approve a self-help book, would they be able to find a single study to reference?
However, a doctor or therapist wouldn't just give you the book and ask you to follow its suggestions on your own. They'd work with you to set up homework (worksheets to identify negative thinking patterns for example), set deadlines and assess how you're doing after 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, etc. They act as an accountability partner.
Judging the efficacy of productivity advice can also be properly assessed via a similar scientific method of observation and experimentation and measurement.
And so we get Self Help Book 2.0, now with a lengthy introduction describing all kinds of relatable issues that convinces you that this is the right book that seems to 'get' you as an individual. But beyond the motivational first chapter, the book still contains those hard-to-do-regularly steps and insists that you must change if your habits are to. So we end up dropping that as well, choosing instead to wait for the next book that makes all the right promises.
Sounds like a research paper written for normals. :). Self-help Book 3.0?
There's so much filler in Atomic Habits it's amazing. I think 10 pages would be too much for what was actually covered.
I wonder if somebody actually did a good summary. It can't be too many pages, really.