It's not derangement, it's a logical method of protesting if you think that it's valid to ban tweets on subjects like qanon, flat out (dangerous) lies, and stirring up violence on Congress on private platforms
Protesting a cause at an innocent persons expense is immature.
It also can escalate into real violence.
Here are some sample tweets I might want to post.
"I'm not saying Elon has killed anyone, but he owns a lot of property where bodies could be buried. Why aren't the authorities looking into this?"
"Fact: Tesla cars are killing more people than any other cause." Yes, it it is patently false, and that is the point.
"People are saying that Elon is forcing his numerous lovers to get abortions. Does anyone know if this is true?" Hey, I'm just asking questions.
I believe twitter accounts allow posting a very short description. I'd probably put something like "Testing the limits of twitter's free speech."
> People are saying that Elon is forcing his numerous lovers to get abortions.
Yes, this is harmful to Elon’s “lovers” and at their expense (not yours, not his).
Yes, this is deranged.
Yes, people can support your right to say this while thinking you are really immature, thoughtless, and not even remotely creative.
I understand you disagree with me. Call me deranged is over the top. Calling me immature and thoughtless and not even remotely creative is also a broadside that you can't possibly know. How about we talk about ideas rather than you psychoanalyzing me?
You have taken great offense that I hypothetically might say something untrue on twitter. Have you spent this much energy combating the actual harmful BS that is actually on twitter? Have you written more about my comment or about Elon Musk calling that scuba diver who helped rescue those kids a pedophile?
Although groups like qanon tend to sway naive users to extremism, it would be unfair to silence different thoughts just because it "may" lead to that.
Fight bad ideas with better ones.