It may be important here to separate journalists and political activists from the intellectual community. Not to say that they aren’t intellectuals, but the issue could be limited to that set of intellectuals in particular.
It may be important here to separate journalists and political activists from the intellectual community. Not to say that they aren’t intellectuals, but the issue could be limited to that set of intellectuals in particular.
* https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/11/business/media/substack-n...
* https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/13/business/media/substack-g...
Along with one of Substack's founders responding to it: https://twitter.com/lulumeservey/status/1514318085083340807
It makes me wonder: how many of the opinions that we are exposed to originate from journalists/activists? How much are we mixing up the opinions of these people as representing the opinions of scientists, engineers and philosophers? How much are we mixing up the opinions of journalists/activists as representing those of your average person?
I'm starting to see a deep issue with the preeminence of journalist/activist opinion.