Here is, for example, a post by unabashed Russian nationalist, in support of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, blaming “Western Supremacist (…) miscreants” for the blood being spilled:

https://akarlin.substack.com/p/happening-the-ukraine-war-202...

One of his previous posts is his analysis of the (then, upcoming) war, its context, and causes.

Of course, you need to take it with an open pit sized block of salt — eg he predicted that the Russia will most likely conquer Ukraine in less than a week. This, needless to say, turned to be laughably wrong, and makes rest of his analysis rather questionable.

The point is, however, that you are unlikely to see this sort of unabashed (indeed, proud) and undistorted Russian perspective elsewhere in western media sphere — indeed, I wouldn’t be surprised if this comment got downvoted for “spreading Russian propaganda”. Myself, I think it is extremely important to understand the perspective and motivation of the enemy, so that you can predict their movements and effectively prevent or resist them.

I'd say one example would be Curtis Yarvin:

https://graymirror.substack.com

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin

Also Nick Land:

https://zerophilosophy.substack.com

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Land

I became aware of substack after Gleen Greenwald moved to it after being censored by the newspaper he literally founded himself...

Matt Taibbi recently started a substack for anti-war Russian journalists whose work had been censored in Russia.

https://russiandissent.substack.com/

El Gato Malo, was banned from twitter for what was an innocuous post, probably for being 2 years ahead on the COVID narrative and used public data sources to refute the consensus on lockdowns.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/

Here’s one: https://alexberenson.substack.com/

(Former NY Times reporter)

Not to lionize him as an important voice on the issue, but any of Greenwald's posts on gender.

According to [1] anti-vaxxers "have flocked to Substack, podcasting platforms and a growing number of right-wing social media networks over the past year after getting kicked off or restricted on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube."

If you're interested in censored material more broadly, you might be interested in the ALA's most challenged books lists [2] which include such classics as "Of Mice and Men" and "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" along with books as widely loved as "Harry Potter" and "James and the Giant Peach"

[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/01/27/substac... [2] https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbook... https://www.ala.org/advocacy/bbooks/frequentlychallengedbook...

What makes you think HN would allow such links?