>individual farms might want to look at relative growth rates of corn in their fields, or soil moisture levels, etc.
a LOT of people want this, but they would never pay $x,xxx/month for that, ever.
Eos (iirc it’s been a while) actually let me buy some imagery, but they would only give me pictures, not actual georeferenced rasters.
The actual manipulation and use of the data, even for machine learning, is pretty straightforward these days with ArcGIS. So yes, I want pixels.
And I can imagine the cheaper customers are a lot less educated and don't have the right expectations, like how often their target area is covered in clouds.
I work for John Deere. I can't speak for the company. I'll confirm we are intersted in imagining, but I won't comment on our plans to deal with the above issues.