>...However, they were later slightly more optimistic, writing, "it may also be the start of something good... there may be a path forward. We don't want to comment on next steps until that path is at least visible to us"

How on earth can people just shake off a loss of $182MM? And is this one of those contracts? Have the courts ruled that code is law, and that a poorly implemented and exploitable contract is legal? There is so much wrong with this.