At least boot camps I know do job placement as well as the camp itself. An entirely self taught person has all the chips stacked against them.
At least boot camps I know do job placement as well as the camp itself. An entirely self taught person has all the chips stacked against them.
I think if you're legitimately smart and dedicated, and put the time in to build knowledge, you'll be able to get a start somewhere. And once you have real work experience, the credential becomes less and less relevant.
FWIW I do find there's value in actual comp sci and software engineering degrees, and I will give those some amount of weight. But as far as bootcamps, if two candidates demonstrate the same level of skill, knowledge, dedication, etc., it makes zero difference to me if one has a boot camp and the other is self taught.
We haven't been able to get our interviewers do that consistently, and a lot of our self-taught hires report that basically no one in the past has ever grilled them about their personal projects, and that we were the first company to do so.
That sounds like exactly the core of the broken hiring processes. Shouldn't a good hiring manager try to create a process that finds these brilliant, intelligent candidates?
The QA route - the modern version of the oft vaunted “start in the mail room and work hard” position - is mostly gone too.