The NFT bubble is showing clear signs of bursting
fortune.com
fortune.com
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/currencies/weekly-n...
2. NFT Mania Show Signs of Cooling as Average Price and Sales Decline
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-03/nft-mania...
3. NFT sales plummet by 80% and trigger the 'great NFT sell-off'
https://www.tweaktown.com/news/85073/nft-sales-plummet-by-80...
4. NFT sales hit $25 billion in 2021, but growth shows signs of slowing
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/technology/nft-sal...?
Good riddance
Exactly. Good riddance to the useless JPEG NFTs and the oversupply and saturation of silly NFT projects that have no use case and will wither away.
We need a market crash to wipe out these JPEG NFT projects that have no use case in this cycle.
The majority of the JPEG NFTs which is around 90% of them will collapse with the remaining 10% of NFTs with utility that will still survive.
Even after this crash however, I'm afraid they aren't going to completely go away anytime soon.
> 100%. Any functionality NFTs offer already has a less technical solution.
So according to both of you, that means with 100% certainty it is going to completely go away after this crash; guaranteed?
Are you both sure? I would not argue against it completely going away entirely with such certainty and absolutism.
NFTs may have some potential but at the moment it's just speculation driven by greed: as long as I can get the next guy to buy this JPEG for 1 gajillion, I don't mind spending my lfe savings on it. Which history has taught us never ends well.
IMO, the crash will trim off the speculators and leave NFTs to possibly develop organic usage. For now, I maintain it's just a solution begging for a big enough problem to justify its price.
I'm asking you that same question, so you tell me. That's why I also said 'Are you both sure?'
> NFTs may have some potential but at the moment it's just speculation driven by greed.
> IMO, the crash will trim off the speculators and leave NFTs to possibly develop organic usage.
So you are in agreement with me then?
There exists a small minority of NFTs that are not 'JPEGs' or 'JPEG projects' that are also not part of the 90% that have no use case and will collapse, but instead are part of that 10% that have utility then?
Here is a business that is using something called ENS (Which the names are NFTs). [0] [1]. ENS is used for translating human readable names to addresses and allows users to send, sign, verify and reference anything without using a third party service for that.
Now an answer to my question. Since it seems you're also replying for the other person:
>> So according to both of you, that means with 100% certainty it is going to completely go away after this crash; guaranteed?
Both commenters not even sure about their own absolutist statements and have both failed to answer my simple question.
As expected.