In short, he will do it if he thinks he can get away with it, so we need to be extremely clear that he will not get away with it, and prepared to follow through if the worst happens.
In short, he will do it if he thinks he can get away with it, so we need to be extremely clear that he will not get away with it, and prepared to follow through if the worst happens.
I've wondered what a proportionate response would be though. Sevastapol? From the NATO perspective it would make sense since they consider it occupied territory, but from the Russian perspective that would be an escalation.
Perhaps within occupied eastern Ukraine? I doubt Ukrainians would see two nukes on their territory as an improvement. I've got no idea what a proportionate response would be.
Also (https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_50068.htm) “The fundamental purpose of NATO’s nuclear forces is for deterrence”. AFAIK, they don’t have any idea about responses to nuclear attacks on NATO, let alone on ones on non-NATO countries.