So this affected you personally? You were banned from twitter?
I hate this line of reasoning, and I also hate that it's so prevelantly used in our legal system (we have a legal system, not a justice system FWIW). This same flawed line of thought has prevented lawsuits against the government for their illegal spying. Since "no one can prove they were harmed", and "proving you were harmed is against the law" we're stuck.
Consider the following: A pending meteor impact harms absolutely no one until right before it impacts and harms everyone.
How did the administration force a private company to make a choice here? I'm not following that part.
I’m sorry but your entire logical structure comes off as absurd to me.
We have a fundamentally evil and absurd government, and you’re asking me how anyone was “forced” to do anything? Really?