It is basically never a compliment (whereas "mental" occasionally has a positive/fun connotation now).
It makes reading about Americans talking about "mentalists", including some of the comments on this page, very funny indeed.
It is basically never a compliment (whereas "mental" occasionally has a positive/fun connotation now).
It makes reading about Americans talking about "mentalists", including some of the comments on this page, very funny indeed.
But yeah, it is now in common usage. A bit like their/they're/there and "should of", it hurts my pedantic sensibilities, but in the end, people will speak how they want to speak and if enough of them agree, the language just changes.
I'm not as sure about the violence aspect of it, but certainly the rest rings true. Imagine the scene, you're driving in London and someone pulls out in front of you and does a series of weird manoeuvres, holding up the whole street for what feels like several hours. An appropriate exclamation could be "What the f*ck are you doing you utter mentalist?"
"You ran 15km before breakfast? You bloody mentalist" "You carried on drinking even after I left? Mentalist"
and so on.
Well some of this I include under high-risk social behaviour I suppose.
But it's a good observation. I can't think of a time recently I've heard it used positively.