Maybe we should first do a correlation and causality analysis and see what it yields instead of closing our eyes because of PC?
Maybe we should first do a correlation and causality analysis and see what it yields instead of closing our eyes because of PC?
https://www.consultancy.nl/nieuws/39000/pwc-belastingdienst-... (dutch)
> PwC considers it plausible that the people who ended up on the blacklist on the basis of appearance or nationality were disadvantaged as a result. Like others on the list, they presumably did not qualify for smooth debt restructuring, debt forgiveness, or a personal payment arrangement. Unlike in the allowance affair, according to PwC, the list played no role in the assessment of income tax returns.
aannemelijk vermoedelijk
They can't point to a single case in which this happened?
"Bij het inschatten van frauderisico’s beoordeelde de Belastingdienst zeker tientallen mensen op hun nationaliteit en uiterlijk, zo blijkt uit onderzoek van PwC. Zo kwamen de mensen terecht op de Fraude Signaleringsvoorziening (FSV), beter bekend als de zwarte lijst."
Is fraud genetic? I don't think so, so it's only a correlation at most.
Country of origin might cause low income and low social mobility.