Finland has one of the bigger armies in Europe (way bigger then many of the existing european NATO members). At least for the baltic NATO members Finland being a member is a huge boon basically blocking Russian fleet into the bay where Saint Petersburg is as the Gulf of Finland is rather narrow (you can literally see from Helsinki to Tallin if you go top of a tall building) completing the encirclement of Russia on its western border.
Sweden also helps with controlling the Baltic sea due to Gotland.
All NATO members have allied troops stationed within their borders, so non-involvement isn't even possible.
So what happens if they decided to go town on each other someday? A5 invocation, first come first served? I really don't know what that would imply.
[0]: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/f-16/f-16-bulg...
> Also, should I mention that Article 5 has never been tested yet
It has, the US invoked it after 9/11
As for you presumptions about NATO and Russia, you're just guessing, same as anybody. However seeing Russian atrocities across the world, I'm very happy there's an alliance containing them. They can't use NATO's existence as an excuse for their war crimes in Ukraine and you shouldn't be using that excuse for them. Their narrative has been that Ukraine isn't a real country. Without NATO, do you think they wouldn't have said the Baltics, Poland, and who knows who else also aren't real countries?
Stability in Europe. The west doesn't want refugees from whatever country Russia decided to invade this week to show up on their doorstep all the time, or the supply chain interruptions that happen when war constantly breaks out. You might remember that NATO arose almost immediately after World War 2 which had a rather negative effect on Europe and European influence in the world.
> Obviously, Russia has nothing more to lose given the sanctions, so, the only thing left is a direct NATO conforntation,
Russia has plenty more to lose. Namely every major European power and the US unloading all their armaments on Russian cities that are very close to the border.
> but it seems that the West is more afraid of such conflict than Putin, who believes that this is inevitable and that if you're faced with an inevitable flight, it's better to strike first.
This is an absolutely unrealistic take. Russia _can not_ win major combat against NATO in any shape or form. They couldn't do it with their made up propaganda army and they certainly can't do it with their actual army.