As w3m is able to display images in the terminal there is no need for such a notice.
> No images (without terminal hacks). Images viewable externally via keystroke.
In fact I find it very strange how they're introducing the only terminal web browser with inline image support as one incapable of displaying inline images, then writing an entire paragraph about why you don't need inline images in the first place.
[a]: Only in the debian fork, mind you. The website seems to link to an unmantained version for some incomprehensible reason.