I told a coworker once that I subscribed to the ACM (which I don’t anymore), and he looked at me like I’d just parted the Red Sea. He was amazed I could understand them. I told him I could only understand about half (closer to 3/4) which mollified him a bit.
There are any number of reasons I have stayed engineering track instead of going into management but the biggest is that talking about things and doing them are vastly different, and we’ve structured management and research around talking. Some days I worry I may know more about project management than I know about cloud or React, but it would kill me to be telling people how to do the job that I’m not also doing, and if I don’t like how they did it, have only words available to get it fixed.
In one of my hobbies, time and the pandemic have slowed me down quite a bit and I’m trying to manage more and do less, but unlike work there are plenty of opportunities to lead by doing. Doing 5-10% of the work and then guiding people to do the rest is socially acceptable.
In software we sometimes call that a lead developer, but that definition changes from situation to situation. But the more you do the less influence you tend to have on what you’re doing and why. Is that human nature or leftover from feudalism?