Context in mind, what jumps out to me is a remarkable compositional competence of the algorithm, even when given extremely vague prompts like "happy sisyphus". The images match the prompt remarkably well with a few notable exceptions like "cottagecore tech-adjacent young robert moses", where it seemed to have focused on "cottage" rather heavily, not understanding cottagecore as an aesthetic neologism, and "power bottom dad is for the people", which definitely got the "dad" part, but it looks like it still struggled to understand "power bottom" (perhaps the curation of training data may have contributed to this). Even if these were curated specifically to match the prompt, what the algorithm was able to do with profiles is amazing (especially bearing in mind that these profiles are meant to be evocative, intentionally idiosyncratic blendings of extremely complex, contextual terms that were written without visual representation in mind, even if they gesture at specific aesthetics)

Side note: what might make artists a bit relieved is the fact that artifacting is still pretty apparent even in the curated examples. Fine details or even whole figures sometime devolve into that scrambled topography familiar to AI art. Even in more compositionally competent artworks, the "brush strokes" frequently have identifiable blurs at the margins. Text also seems to be gibberish even if aesthetically coherent. Even still, these are all such minor issues that additional photoshop would be both easy and readily doable.

Overall, this is frankly stunning and I'm really excited to see what others come up with. I feel like it's language and composition ability definitely did not disappoint the hype of its press release.