Take a look at a project I worked on, Long Bets: https://longbets.org/
The theory is that putting predictions out there is the best way to learn. And looking at the results from this project, I think that's the case. The specificity of the predictions and the description of the reasoning helps us understand both the world and ourselves.
So I congratulate georgespencer for making a specific, testable prediction that turned out wrong. It's very interestingly wrong! Instagram didn't end up being just a photo service. Instead, it's a social phenomenon that uses photos in a deeply different way than we had seen previously. His prediction helps us see how much has changed in the 10 years since. There are a lot of people out there doin' it for the 'gram. There are plenty of people who life for and/or live off of it.
And personally, I suspect I would have agreed with georgespencer at the time. I like photography and like sharing photos. But I really dislike Instagram; it's not for me. So this is a reminder to me that just because a thing doesn't make sense to me doesn't mean it won't be hugely popular in world-changing ways.
Looking at how badly old predictions miss the mark serves as a good reminder that the bets we make today for the future are probably just as wrong.
Big fan of https://longbets.org/ as well for similar reasons.
I wish there was a bookmark from 2021/22 on the price of BTC/ETH and the prevalence of NFTs in 10 years ...
Getting things wrong is common and thinking the reasons for being wrong is illuminating. Learning and calibrating from previous errors is a good thing.