I am unsure if most people are aware of this, but most of the scientists whose work is consumed by the IPCC + those working on the models published by the IPCC know that the "consensus" view is wrong. Except, it's wrong in the opposite direction to what certain people want it to be.
The reality is far worse than what the models suggest. The models still don't include the loss of permafrost - what's worse is that they don't model the non-linearity of permafrost loss, methane emission, that then sparks more warming and more permafrost loss etc, https://www.woodwellclimate.org/review-of-permafrost-science... nor do they include effects of how the climate would change of ocean conveyor currents shut down (AMOC in particular is of significant interest, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/11/12/concern-grows-over... ). They also don't model the melting and release of clathrates from the ocean, or the effects of ocean acidification, and several other non-linear processes.
Another significant issue that they haven't adequately addressed is the loss of ice around the arctic, particularly the recent failure in the formation of sea ice in the Laptev sea. It's the most damning graph that I'm aware of, https://twitter.com/ZLabe/status/1431688657245589505 - the main ice feeding region for the arctic remains unfrozen for longer, and longer, and takes longer to refreeze. Leading to greater sunlight absorption that further increases the temperature of the waters due to the decrease in albedo, https://www.ipcc.ch/srocc/chapter/chapter-3-2/ - but the feedback loop itself isn't fully modeled in the reports that the IPCC publishes. I might be wrong on this count, but it is what I recall from my prior reading, https://archive.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/295.htm
I had a very polite, but heated argument with one of the scientists involved and he told me that they aren't going to include that, because if they do, the numbers will look much worse and they'll be dismissed as apocalyptic loons.
Which brings us to the point that Dr Feynman made in his remarks about the Challenger disaster,
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."
For our civilization to be successful, we must face this this reality. We must realize that nature cannot be fooled. Nature is relentless. It does not care about our petty human needs to be respectable. It simply is.