I suspect OSX is no different and has similar telemetry and privacy policy for its terminal.
I suspect OSX is no different and has similar telemetry and privacy policy for its terminal.
At work I have used it in some cases when not given the choice.
If some company I am working for is fine with the Windows CLIs telemetry, then I suppose it is up to them, although I'd argue against it.
There's also the rumor that Terminal in macOS has had a handful of developers working on it, at best, over the years. I would bet money that Apple doesn't care enough about it to bother with telemetry and/or privacy policies for it.
Fwiw I never bothered with iTerm, Terminal is good enough for me. It even supports some old school vt100 stuff like double width and height fonts. It's one of the better vt100 compatible ones.
> There's also the rumor that Terminal in macOS has had a handful of developers working on it, at best, over the years.
This but every app on the mac that isn't Safari.
Eh, I know it's a joke but there are full teams who work on Pages/Numbers/etc.
I suspect it's the same codebase, but don't have a proof of that.
I too use iTerm for its rich features, but the stock terminal is known to have lower latency [1] so some people might prefer that.
edit: use -> choose
In my experience, most people who are developing software for Windows choose to use it to develop that software. There are a great many people who choose to develop software for Windows.
But I choose not to.
wrong, Apple isn't Microsoft
Whenever I do that, I can never decide whether it's me who's using Windows or Windows that's using me :-(