Λ-2D: Exploration of Drawing as Programming Language, Ideas from Lambda Calculus
media.mit.edu
media.mit.edu
The language resembles https://esolangs.org/wiki/Funciton
Nice start to providing a simple way to visually interact/experiment/manipulate different multiple Neural network concepts by loading/transforming any traditional code (working or not) & reshuffling/tesselating the structual representation of the code to generate a turing tape path via color execution paths.
Switching to pi calculus could provide the theory to support coroutine/coprossing/ threading" multiple interacting tape paths/color combinations/path diffs/scaled recusion to perform assembly language instructions. Raster graphics without the yak ( https://verdagon.dev/blog/yak-shave-language-engine-game ) Feed back between tape & "traditional code" as neural network layer(s)!
Flexiable code (via tessilations) without changing the actual imported source code! So, complete svg (tape interactions) web page as code source on how to interact with web page, ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6sGWTCMz2k )
what's displayed/played, documentation & usage manual included within code structure!
Unicode permits implied piping rich kern font without all the tech fluff. Unicode fails because allows infinate multics and is there for k&r incomplete. But, this approach is way more dimensional/colorful than unicode/tech stuff.
?? can one's code unintentially provide a wordle problem & solution in one package ?? (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v68zYyaEmEA )
?? turing complete fourier transforms https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spUNpyF58BY
toolkit concepts:
Neural networks / analog stuff : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVsUOuSjvcg
perceptrons: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVsUOuSjvcg
spreadsheets (: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBX2QQHlQ_I
(turing spreadsheets -> https://www.felienne.com/archives/2974 )
https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-busy-beaver-game-illuminates-the-fundamental-limits-of-math-20201210/
BB theory : https://www.scottaaronson.com/papers/bb.pdf
BB(8000) : https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=2725
#### electrons do not spin -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWlk1gLkF2Y
#### prime number spirals -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK32jo7i5LQ
#### modular arithmetic : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJ3CD9M3nEQ
speed things up : https://github.com/vqd8a/DFAGE
Can this approach be used to classify programs as contributing to verifying
'Hichiker's Guide to the Galaxy' universal answer to 42 or must 42 be qualified as
an imaginary number?