Remember that all evidence for everything starts with the anecdotal; and that for how much of the population is vaccinated, suggesting issues have been overlooked is not fun or easy.
But, despite this, the UK regulator says no link has been established between changes to periods and the vaccines."
If I’m a public health expert, why not say it must be 400k to be a link? If it ever gets there, why not say 600k?
Now I know better. Approach everything with massive skeptism. I wonder what the next facade is being hid when I see a story like this and if we'll ever come to know given the interests that are in charge.
It’s good to track and chase down anomalous effects, of course. I wouldn’t immediately jump to a conclusion here.