The awful rise of ‘virtue signalling’ (2018)
spectator.co.uk
spectator.co.uk
I’m convinced that progressive virtue signaling in 2020 set the cause of police reform back a decade. Having lived in downtown Atlanta, Baltimore, and Wilmington, I knew that voters in those cities were skittish about crime. These are the moms who show up every year to vote in municipal elections. When Larry Hogan sent the Maryland national guard in to quell rioting in Baltimore after Freddie Gray’s death, his approval rating in the overwhelmingly Black and Democrat city shot up over 70%. Police reform only happens in these communities when voters feel their kids are safe.
In the summer of 2020, however, you had people who had never paid any attention to policing or racial justice issues before egging on riots and amplifying some of the stupidest far left ideas. These were people who didn’t live in these communities, had no understanding of the politics in these cities, and had no skin in the game anyway. The result was predictable: homicides skyrocketed, citizens of these cities freaked out, and police budgets are bigger than ever. Atlanta’s previously popular mayor (who had never really supported defund or similar messaging but got painted as not doing enough in response to rising crime) bowed out and didn’t run for re-election. Progressive candidates got hammered in elections like in NYC. The mayor of SF is throwing the city’s DA under the bus. It’s a damn mess.
I mostly agree with your overall sentiment, but you got over your skis when you attempted to blame crime on protesters.
> Campbell’s research also indicates that these protests correlate with a 10 percent increase in murders in the areas that saw BLM protests. That means from 2014 to 2019, there were somewhere between 1,000 and 6,000 more homicides than would have been expected if places with protests were on the same trend as places that did not have protests.
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/study-killings-surge...
> Homicide rates in 2020 topped 2019 levels during every month, but the increase was steepest after massive protests spurred by George Floyd's death in Minneapolis on May 25. The study found that in June through August, homicides rose 37% compared to 2019.
> The authors said homicides also spiked in the mid-2010s when protests followed the deaths of young Black people at the hands of police, including 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, in 2014.
There’s probably multiple causes, to be sure. But nothing kills the public appetite for police reform then riots followed by rising crime. Counter-intuitively, the best response to the riots—in terms of long-term police reform efforts—probably would have been rapid response by state national guards to end them quickly.
Or if that was too much effort you could just show up at church and complain about the heathens and their wicked ways.
Seems to me that what the author is saying is a new phenomenon is actually as old as civilisation.
It boils down to saying something is good because it's critics only dislike it because it makes them look good to criticise it.
There's no affirmative arguments for the thing in question, and any argument about virtue signalling just says that society considers the alternative virtuous - an argument against your non-virtuous opinions
It's the attempt to paint one's self with good deeds, without actually having done any, that is problematic.
Perhaps you are experiencing white fragility from your worldview being questioned?
Here's an experiment - the next time you're out (if you still do that), take a look around and see how many people are wearing masks. Of that sample, how many of them have long hair?
The thing that typifies white liberals most to me is their desire to be adorned with an aura of virtue while still doing the absolute bare minimum in order to be seen as such. Conspicuous displays such as mask wearing are low-effort, low-cost, require little to no compromise or change in one's lifestyle and behavior, and signal to fellow whites or allied tribespeople that you are on the same side.
But when it comes to making an actual sacrifice - not even a significant one, I would posit! - suddenly all those lambasting the "alt right" are nowhere to be found. Short hair, fades, crew cuts abound - what happened? Weren't we just shaming our neighbors on social media for wanting to get haircuts? For having outdoor barbecues in the park? Where were you, when society called for your sacrifice?
At the barber's, it seems.
Now think - if there are this many people willing to skirt quarantine and stay-at-home orders while making outward displays of conformity... how many more of these self-proclaimed progressives actually secretly harbor racist beliefs while still reciting the common refrains of diversity and inclusion?
I've developed tactics for unmasking the fakers and pretend-quarantiners. I am working to develop social technologies to unmask the pretend anti-racists now.
And what is this moan about hair all about? Are you trying to refer to the Nancy Pelosi getting a haircut "incident"? Or are you one of those folks going around telling long-haired people to, "get a job, hippie!"?
Does COVID not strike at the dinner table? Or is there some other purpose to this theater?
If people really practiced the virtues of true self-isolation and quarantine, out of concern for how the virus actually spreads (which is _through human contact_) there wouldn't be nearly this many people with immaculate short haircuts. One wonders how barbers pay the rent otherwise.
Aren't the people who defiantly enter places with mask mandates without their masks also signalling their virtue of being "free thinkers" and "not a government sheeple"? But if I can guess, that's OK for you because they're the ones doing the right thing.
I'd tell you you suffer from confirmation bias, but hey, I guess you've heard that too. But no! You're right and everyone else are morons!
No mind reading required. Simply observing the whites.
If only we could have convinced more of the rabid anti-maskers of this. Sadly they were too busy virtue-signalling about how the tyrannical government was stripping away their essential liberties.
The people intentionally flouting public health mandates in some cases I’m sure genuinely had medical reasons to not. But most didn’t do it because they simply didn’t want to, and found comrades in others that denounced the mandates. This side was most certainly political and the lack of a mask was a public and obvious way to signal their beliefs against what they felt was oppression. And public health mandates are genuinely oppressive, which is why Supreme Court law has had to be settled (over a hundred years ago) that they’re allowed in a country with liberty at its core.
But I don’t think the two sides are symmetric. One is complying with the law of the land and acting in self preservation which requires only acquiesce, the other is resisting it and trying to build a consolidated movement around their cause. The first can’t reasonably be a form of virtue signaling, while the second may very well be.