This has a similarity to the original story here, in that the original sounded like: "They behaved a lot like a scammer would, but I also totally expect my real bank to behave like a scammer would".
In the standard/credit card section (not, for example, credit card debt collections), it was rare to have to make outbound calls, but when they were needed, no information could be given out until the customer answered security questions. Some customers questioned this because it was exactly what they’d been told never to do. They were told that of course it was right to be cautious, and they could call back, but that they would need to wait in the queue and likely speak to a different person. This was all before they could even be told what they were being called about.
Perhaps half the people questioned the process upon receiving the call (“you called me, and you want ME to prove who I am?”, but very few hung up and called back.
From memory, this was mostly improved later on - no security questions needed unless some sort of action needed to be taken on the account.
The only thing we can do about "bank behaviors make it easier for scammers" is to change bank behaviors. It's not an easy process, but unfortunately it is a necessary process.
Guess it will take a few years of getting slapped for it to filter down.
The process to get listed is the same as a scammer’s process to ensure you get listed.
Some exchanges will say “no we would never handle this with DMs over telegram”
/gets listed by being introduced to someone with a DM over telegram/