The "derivative operator" notion that the GP is describing was hugely important for me in intuiting what linalg could do.
Do you have a link someone could read more about this ?
This is actually a common theme of mathematics, that the individual objects are in some sense less interesting than maps between them. And, of course, the idea that any time you have a bunch of individual mathematical objects of the same type, mathematicians are going to group them together and call it a "space" of some kind.
In fact, my previous paragraph is pretty much the basis for category theory. One almost never looks at individual members of a category other than a few, selected special objects like initial and terminal objects. A lot of algebra works in a similar way. If I could impart one important insight from all the mathematics I've read, done, and seen, it would be this idea of relations being more important than the things themselves.
That way, one gradually develops a level of mathematical maturity that allows an appreciation of abstraction.
I read about half of this. It’s nearly incomprehensible to me - I’d have to dig to find out what he’s trying to accomplish.
He’s going out of his way to introduce novelty and it appears he will try anything except address the subject directly.
I didn’t even know until today there was a concept called linear algebra, it was taught to me as introductory geometry alongside other geometry concepts. So that’s neat to learn!