Can we not call every "cloud provider" an alternative to AWS? Number of services in provider's offer should be taken into consideration, along with how established/stable the provider is.
It may be an alternative to AWS in the future but now it's an immature offer corresponding to few percent of service AWS has.
Website works for me?!
edit: Also, it's not "LIDL cloud", it's just the same holding. Makes for a less clickbaity title, but yeah...
It should be called LIDL cloud. If we keep calling it LIDL cloud maybe they'll change the name.