There have been a few occasions where I would gladly have paid Google/Twitter/Apple to answer my questions.
There have been a few occasions where I would gladly have paid Google/Twitter/Apple to answer my questions.
It's also a big part of many people's social lives these days (like it or not).
We want to switch now to professional and can’t despite fulfilling all the criteria they tell you need.
I would like to see legislation forcing detailed explanations of bans though.
It's more head scratching to me that people think it's going to be easier to pass legislation than to go through the existing legal channels when a company's policies are causing damages. You sue them.
Every business needs some kind of legal advice, they don't have to be on retainer. You probably did have one or more lawyers that your leadership was in contact with for particulars. Every business I've worked at has dealt with legal bullshit at some point (even the 3-4 person startups!).
The worst part was the complete and absolute silence from Twitter. I tried opening a support ticket and got no response. DAYS later, I got an automated email about what I needed to do, but the instructions didn't even work. Eventually I was able to get my account back about a week after that by going through some cumbersome verification process.
All for sharing a dumb space meme.
In that moment, if I could pay $10 to talk to an actual human being who could resolve my problem or at least tell me what I needed to do, even if it was via web-chat, I would gladly have done so.
Living in a liberal democracy has made me so used to the system working mostly fairly that these interactions with a ‘fiefdom’ introduce some sort of cognitive dissonance.