Stackit: Cloud and Colocation
stackit.de
stackit.de
Have ordered servers from Hetzner online for the last 20 years, since their cloud offering via API/cli.
An image of a passport proves nothing btw, especially since Hetzner is not a UK Govt Agency, that I am aware of, and has zero methods of authenticating such 'evidence' of ID.
Of course today we have better methods, but Hetzner was founded in the dot.com bubble and since then focused their innovation on providing cheap and reliable servers, not on changing business processes that work (or making pretty interfaces).
It may prove a fraudster have basic Web searching skills. [1]
If someone is willing to do something wrong, why these companies imagine they wouldn't provide a fake document ID?
Imagine one is spinning up a Hertzner VM to hack and steal something or run a DDoS attack. The minute they see: "upload your passport ID", who thinks they'll go "oh no, we're busted, let's work honestly instead".
It's almost childish how ridiculous online KYC (know your customer) processes are.
[1] https://www.google.com/search?q=example+of+british+passport+...
Amazon's cool with it. I guess they don't care as much? I do wonder where the fraud prevention requirements come from. It's an interesting question if they are even for fraud prevention.
"Well, there goes the Privacy - Hetzner Hosting" https://www.reddit.com/r/privacytoolsIO/comments/b5qp08/well...
So, it's enough of a verification.
In my case they just wanted a copy of my company registration certificate.
I still think their performance/pricing is good, but sales/customer experience was really poor.
"...Two-thirds of German companies regularly use faxes, whereas only half of them use video conferencing technologies, and just one-third use messaging services or online collaboration tools..."
https://www.handelsblatt.com/english/companies/digitization-...
Fax still being common is true though, it's mostly used as a quicker alternative to mail with established legal standing and more convenient than rolling out electronic signature schemes. You can still live and work without a fax in Germany, you will just be sending more letters. I've never sent a fax or letter to a German cloud provider though (despite using several of them)
1: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1929/umfrage/...
"Japan’s reliance on fax machines lambasted by coronavirus doctor": https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/coronavirus-ja...
"Japan Can't Get Rid of the Fax Machine With Offices Demanding It Stays": https://www.insider.com/japan-cant-get-rid-the-fax-machine-o...
"Electricity prices in Germany ranked amongst highest globally" (2021):
https://www.iamexpat.de/expat-info/german-expat-news/electri...
BTW what you're showing here is small consumer electricity rates. Large consumers of electricity in Germany have significant fee exemptions. It's one of the reasons why small consumers have it more expensive: in Germany, lots of the costs are offloaded away from the industrial users.
"Data Center Power Costs":
"...In a data center, typically 20-40 % of the operating cost is related to data center power costs..."
https://greenmountain.no/2020/07/01/data-center-power-costs/
Also in the article above there this bar chart: https://greenmountain.no/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Cost-of-...
were once more Germany costs for electricity are so much higher than anybody else.
"How Much Does it Cost to Power One Rack in a Data Center?":
https://www.nlyte.com/blog/how-much-does-it-cost-to-power-on...
"...The energy cost to power a single server rack in a data center in the US can be as high as almost $30,000 a year, depending on its configuration. In a data center with 100 cabinets, the cost to power those racks each year can be over $3 million. Data center professionals need to ensure that they are correctly monitoring energy consumption and efficiently managing capacity..."
And as others have noted it's not just Lidl, this group owns also Kaufland which also swallowed up another chain (Real) recently. So they are huge.
If you have an example of a German IT company requiring a fax, please share, so I can mock my German co-workers ;)
"German health care: Tackling COVID with paper, pen and a fax machine": https://www.dw.com/en/german-health-care-tackling-covid-with...
german health-care is thoroughly privatized, thou heavily regulated by the government.
(They rock)
Wasn't sure if you were paying attention or not? [0]
What is wrong with having competition?
[0] https://www.hetzner.com/managed-server [1] https://www.netcup.eu/professional/managed-server/managed-pr...
A dedicated server is nice but if it fails and you have no redundancy, your service goes offline.
i wonder btw... are you German? ;-)
I have serious doubt they would be able to mount a serious challenge to AWS. These German companies - DB, DHL, SAP just don't have cultures meritocratic enough to be competitive with the new boys. Not everything in the world is a post office or a rebar manufacture line.
I don't see it happening, at least not with what they're showing.
I also don't think they will be a serious contendor to the current companies
If they can get a decent traction, they can scale-up step by step. Rome didn't got built in a day.
Edit: Oracle advertise $0.0085 as being per GB/hour, but it's actually just per GB.
I haven't used it professionally.
That, and Germans value contracts/stability over many other things - including the customers themselves.
I've started companies in both countries - the burden and costs of starting and running one in Germany is far higher.
In the US, I can start selling muffins, wooden furniture, whatever to my friends, family, and neighbors without doing anything. I can walk into a local grocery store and convince the owner to carry my products. I can test out markets and use Stripe, Paypal, Patreon: any payment service I want without doing a single thing. At most, I just have to pay my taxes at the very end of the year. I can do all that while working 1, even 2 jobs if I want. I can pick up a shift at Uber, then work on my business. You can't just start an Etsy store here.
None of those things are possible here and are all underlined by ones appetite for risk. Handling VAT is a literal nightmare. Monthly invoices, dealing with the Finanzamt on a monthly basis for the first year or two. Everything comes with stipulations/exceptions and requires a careful reading of the law - which of course, is impossible for anyone to understand, so you're forced to hire a lawyer.
It costs like 20 bucks to dissolve an LLC. How much does it cost to dissolve an UG?
I wasn't trying to insinuate that one country is better than another. With the burdens comes stability. My company is rock solid here. There will basically never be a competitor for me, because the burden is too high for anyone to stomach.
That said, being part of the same 'group' there might be enough insulation to avoid this link damaging the company, but since the Lidl connection is proudly mentioned on each page in the footer. I think that they either don't realize that it might be a risk to declare that so openly or they don't care in the same way that scammers don't care about you figuring out they are scammers, if you are offended by that then they probably don't want to hire you because you just might be aware of your market value.
For some more information about Lidl employer-employee relationships:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lidl#Working_conditions_and_la...
It's also true that Amazon is consistently the worst employer in all areas including their AWS staff, where they are worried about (and I quote) "Burning through all competent human capital"[0] in certain parts of the world.
With those two factors (Lidl being above the baseline, amazon being below): your comment seems like FUD.
[0]: https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-warehouse-turnover-wo...
And your comment reads as though 'AWS is worse' is a defense of Lidl. It should be possible to do right by your employees, not to see who can get away with the most harm without being outright liable.
'Little' things like asking your female employees that are on their period to wear colored headbands to be allowed toilet privileges or employees committing suicide due to work pressure does not fall in 'not perfect', that's outright hostile.
See provided reference.
The "problem" here is that it's being positioned as a dichotomy between the status quo (Amazon) and an entrant (Lidl) and your claims that Lidl are "bad and I won't use them" implies that you would use Amazon. Since that's what is in the topic.
Not saying they're perfect, as mentioned, all I know is that they're a big employer and externally: they pay better than the competition and have a much higher employee satisfaction rating (where I can see it) than for instance ASDA, Walmart or Swedish chains like Coop and Netto.
Lidl is generally cheap store (there are exceptions when they provide above above-average quality for little price), but where I come from, people are generally happy to work there and they sure pay above average within business.
Lidl is generally cheap store (but there are exceptions when they provide above above-average q, but where I come from, people are generally happy to work there and they sure pay above average within business.
Do you really think Lidl will be able to mistreat the IT stuff, given the current market shortage in Germany?
[Edit] After some googling, yes there was one in France for Lidl, and three for Renault, and three for France Télécom (and more). Is it that other countries do not relate suicides to work (but they exist) or is there something special about France?
(never worked for Lidl, or in France and only shop at Lidl if needed, I don't like their products very much)
https://www.francebleu.fr/infos/societe/lidl-vise-par-une-qu... (in French)
"Blackmail, pressure, favouritism, bullying, sequestration in an office, incitement to suicide and intimidation: the accusations made are edifying, the testimonies surprising. The management of another time."
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/16/technology/amazon-unions-...
Who needs collective bargaining power if the pay is so great.
Witness the number of people that 'didn't get it' and realize that I am not at all surprised that some people would write something like that and mean it, superfluous punctuation or not.
Those traditional companies will never be able to compete with absurd FAANG salaries (that are obscene in my opinion anyway, but that is not the topic) due to the nature of the business. If this thing scales, however, then salaries could be higher.
Finally, I am living in Germany, I have worked for German companies. Many of us dont like the US, we dont like those American services, too. If there was a German alternative, even with a premium, we would pay that. It has to be competetive in functionality, but not necassarily in price.
I'm on a personal vendetta against any company that abuses its employees. Lidl, Amazon, and others besides, consider me an 'equal opportunity employer' when it comes to abusive employers.
Also, your comment is well outside the HN guidelines.
A close friend of mine works for the local Lidl division, she is part of the team that does internal communication and as such she has been directly involved in "marketing" compensation-related stuff and related perks to the company's employees and such. To me it does seem that Lidl, the company, tries to treat its employees as humanly as possible, which is saying something when it comes to the retail market.
I don't know about the personnel abuse, but here in the UK Lidl employees are one of the better paid employees as far as groceries stores go.
EDIT: maybe I was thinking of Aldi, who, after a quick search, seems to pay significantly more than Lidl.
Source: friend who was a market researcher for Tesco
Not sure what branch you are refering to, but that's definitely not the case with their IT department. Their pay and benefits are well above market rate.
That being said, both are irrelevant, since it won't be the first company that treats retails workers like shit, while handling the IT workers like spoiled rock stars.
So does Amazon?
They've had a whole series of scandals, it is one of the worst employers in Europe and some of the stuff they do is just incredible. Some of them are more pressworthy than others but Lidl never really stopped.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lidl#Working_conditions_and_la...
Of course misconduct of management would happen 'in one particular warehouse or shop', where else would it happen? Lidl consists of corporate, warehouses and shops. Most opportunities for abuse will be present in the latter two.
As for the spying scandal: the same board that condoned that still runs the company today, they conveniently scape-goated one individual and threw him under the bus but just like other scandals involving multi-nationals the real perps typically stay out of the firing line.
Lidl paid a 1.5 million euro fine, which is a pittance and their exec a nice golden parachute, who by the way now has a nice little thing going as a high flying consultant:
Their store staff yes indeed, but they won't be able to get away with that for IT staff. The situation is similar to Amazon... those who are essentially disposable cogs get treated as such as far as the law allows (and in some cases even worse), the ones who can't be replaced get paid really well.
Amazon has the same...
New customers then have to either adapt their processes to the process of the "market leader" (no matter if they are fit or not for the purpose or are actually efficient) or they have to adapt the SAP workflows - and that is where it gets hairy as fuck and where the problems arise:
- ABAP programmers are low in supply and high in demand (as the role requires both DBA and general coding skills as well as a ton of SAP-specific knowledge and the patience to deal with the bullshit that is the SAP UI)
- add to that that most people buy SAP skills from third party consultants with all the bullshit that comes with that (inadequate oversight, juniors being sold as seniors, near- and offshoring with timezone and language differences as well as cultural differences)
- the further you deviate from the SAP-prepackaged process the harder any patch or heaven forbid major update becomes. If you fuck it up badly enough you are just finished with releasing the last patch and then you already are in crunch mode again for the next patch.
In my opinion and experience SAP is only relevant these days because of lock-in and "nobody ever got fired for buying IBM" effect and because they are relatively quick at implementing law changes as code, not because the people who actually have to use it want to use it - quite to the contrary. And, speaking as a German, the fact that this company is just about the only major IT company that Germany has is both extremely sad and exemplary for German IT importance in general at the same time.
“I have an idea…”
It's almost like AWS before they expanded to having a mind numbing number of service offerings. Who can keep up with all these? Who, other than people training for cloud architect certifications?
I worry that AWS has lost focus on its core services and instead is trying to market every shiny new thing under the sun... I work in finance, my corp is in us-east region. I think we had like 3 AWS related incidents that caused serious production outages last year... All from use of core AWS services. Now we are looking to support cross-region fault tolerance to defend against this. Supporting such a strategy sounds like it's going to be quite expensive, and technically complex.
> STACKIT services are currently offered to the Group’s internal
> customers and are continuously optimised according to their
> requirements. In the future, it is also planned to offer the
> services on the external market.Nitpicking here, but my god, can German companies/universities/organizations please start paying for native English speakers to do their copy-writing and STOP translating directly from German?
It's "Do you need". Not "You need..."
This is the typical translation of the German marketing "Du brauchst <blah>?" or "Du bist ein <blah>? Dann...". I see pattern this all the time, such as "You are a student who wants to work on innovating projects? Then apply...".
This may sound like a rant, but I genuinely think these little details would go a long way to actually showing that the German economy does have some sort of international mindset. This persistence in sticking to these wrong ways just makes me think that 'OK this is another conservative old-school minded German company trying to play unicorn'. If there's no attention to detail or care for the little things on your front-page marketing website - your first contact with your customer - it just leaves me with a bad feeling about the parts I don't see.
I don't know why it frustrates me enough to write a comment in the middle of the day, I guess I really can't understand how global German corporations still, as a rule all make this same error, which I suspect is just the tip of the iceberg of a larger symptom of not wanting to think outside/beyond the DACH bubble. And I feel a sense of sadness that such a country with great prospects just drags its feet lazily into the the future.
Edit: I also see this all the time in Email correspondence, you can immediately tell if a person is a native German speaker because they don't capitalize the first letter in an English email after "Dear X, we are writing <blah>" (which would be 100% correct in German, but somehow no one teaches this in English classes in Germany that in English it is capitalized). For a country that loves rules, this drives me mad.
Edit2: This is definitely a rant and it triggered me emotionally for some odd reason. I concede that my interpretation is quite exaggerated, so please do excuse me! I'll leave the comment however because I'm curious to know whether any others feel the same way.
Edit3: I will also say that translating between German and English is hard as there are some fundamental differences in their structure. There are very colloquial ways to say or not say certain things. That is why native speakers are essential for such things.
Edit4: Please take this comment with a pinch of salt. This is the rant of an fatigued expat who decided to blow some off steam about the oddities of their host country that drive them bananas. For posterity, I will say there at least 10 amazing wonderful things about German culture that I love, for each odd cultural thing. But you know, at some point when you see something for the umpteenth time, something snaps inside of you and it all comes out, especially on a mid-week day like a Wednesday.
www.ibm.com
www.siemens.de
www.salesforce.com
What is wrong? The "About" must be at the top, the things you provide must be linked with some words at the top or left. They put their images, much Java-Script, and useless stuff across the homepage.The English wording? A minor problem. I'm thankful that Andrew explains what is wrong and how to fix it! As a German, I'm annoyed by Germans who use every chance to tell other people that their English is much better (than mine).
I am a native English speaker who has lived and worked in many countries around the world. In some of those countries English was the primary language, in others it was formalized in the workplace as the business language, in others it was just a lingua franca used by immigrants and expats of many different backgrounds to communicate with one another. One of the best things about English is that it easily adapts to all these roles. It's a flexible language, and there are many different ways to express the same thing. I believe that's one of the reasons why it is so popular as a second language.
English as it is spoken in the professional sphere in Germany is different to the English as it is spoken in the professional sphere in the US or Canada or England or Australia, and that's fine. Ditto India, Singapore, Philippines, South Africa... Unlike Spanish, French, Chinese etc there is no central regulator that defines how the English language is supposed to be used. Grammar can change depending on where you are. English speakers all over the world essentially understand one another, despite using different structures and idioms.
While it is true that completely bastardized grammar can become more difficult to understand, and may result in the language being spoken getting classified more as a pidgin or creole, I don't think it's especially helpful to "nitpick" over this particular issue - a sentence structure that is easily understandable by anyone in the world who can speak English. If "do" gets dropped by English language speakers in the context of questions, what's the big deal? Especially in written language where we use a question mark anyway. Who cares?
I really recommend "Oxford English: a guide to the language" by Ian Dear. It is/was published by Oxford University Press but if you look around on eBay, Abebooks, amazon secondhand etc., you can often find a very cheap "IBM Edition" -- they co-published it along with a dictionary of quotations (presumably they helped compile the latter).
It's a really fantastic volume that goes into such detail about Indian Standard English, for example, that it will make you love English even more.
The international mindset is to be tolerant with non-native speakers. I find it perfectly ok when a German company uses expressions that hint at their origin. Similarly, I'm not bothered when a British company uses British words or a Texas company uses expressions that are typical for their region.
What triggers me, however, is when people misspell expressions in ways that reveal that they have no clue about where the expression comes from. For example, if someone tries to sound smart by using the latin expression "per se" but actually spells it "per say", that reveals to me that they are probably not as educated as they want to appear.
That's a nice eggcorn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eggcorn
But I think that most people (in the international business community) don't notice the details your talking about, so in the end, it really doesn't make sense to pay for a translator. I live in Germany, and even my most brilliant German friends (with basically native English skills) cannot grasp the subtle differences of when to use "this", "that", or "it" (as in, "this one time at band camp" vs "that one time at band camp", "it's awesome" vs "that's awesome" vs "this is awesome"). It's a dead give away, but almost nobody would ever know except native speakers.
I don’t get it, which part is supposed to be capitalized, “dear” or “we”? As a native English speaker the sentence looks correct as it’s written. Or maybe I have bad attention to detail.
We would like to inform you..."
vs
" Dear Ms. Smith,
we would like to inform you..."
However you can always tell your correspondent is German by their capitalization of second-person pronouns! Also the awkward use of "kind regards" because they can sense that "with friendly greetings" doesn't sound right.
"Dear Ms. Smith, we would like to inform You that Your cloud subscription will soon be expiring. Please send Your payment by registered letter to..... Kind Regards, Dieter" ;-)
TIL thanks.
Sadly once you are in the professional world, nobody correct you anymore, so you can't improve/fix your English easily.
>nobody correct you anymore
Should be "nobody corrects you anymore"
Would you also have corrected it if had been text written by Nigerians or others that use a creole or dialect of english?
Pretty bold claim. I bet there are many other languages where the first letter after the salutation isn't capitalized.
I also bet that some native english speakers make the same error.
> BEFORE GOING ANY FURTHER: BRIEFLY ABOUT THE PROCESSING OF YOUR DATA
But... that said, as someone who's only done a bit of German on Duolingo, I don't mind, especially for early-stage services. It says to me more work needs to be done around l10n and copywriting, but as long as they keep improving the core product, it's okay.
In fact what annoys me more than awkward English are teams that download and use generic English-language website templates, resulting in super-generic product pages.
Is this an option in German business culture? Are Germans open to conveying the (mere) gist of a sentence?
Ages ago, we translated our manufacturing software to German. Our German team were an absolute joy to work with. They were so thorough, they'd correct our English, and then translate to German. In other words, our German translators caught mistakes missed by our own technical writers. So awesome.
I'm not sure the reverse is even possible, culturally. Can a German marketing and PR firm accept a localized version of their message? Off the top of my head, I can't think of a German lifestyle product or consumer brand. And the German brands I do know -- BMW, Mercedes, Kraftwerk -- don't much use words for marketing. They don't need to.
NIVEA, Braun, Miele, Bosch, Birkenstock, various chocolates ... and so on. Lots of marketing in awkward English.
Let me try again...
Bullshit is hard to translate. Culturally, German branding may have comparatively less bullshit. And therefore less compulsion to translate nuance. Just describe what the product does.
Amazon recruiting will say stuff like "code ninjas needed to invent future!" Versus "get beaten like a rented mule for two years, to make Bezos even more rich, then fall over dead". (How would one translate either version?)
This LIDL/Schwartz pitch, perfectly normal for America, comes off kinda weird, like maybe satire, from a German company.
Well, I think that Germany's commercial balance shows this much better than non-native-sounding-yet-fully-correct grammar.
I imagine something like "Our customer support is being overworked by completely banal minutiae, what can we do?" We compare different intake funnels, and customers that were presented with a badly translated homepage never reach to support with such issues. Let's make sure to always run that page from now on, those customers aren't worth the hassle. Make sure they stick with AWS and bleed them dry.
When American websites are translated to other languages, sometimes some things end up weird.
By the way, I feel Indians speak that way in casual conversations; "you want coffee?", "you want biscuit?" etc.
I want to make clear - it's not the language issue per se. I think native English speakers are incredibly privileged to have their language as one of if not the international language, so I could never fault a person for not speaking a foreign language well (I'm sure I butcher the German language in ways that would make Goethe himself cry out in anguish).
It's the fact that this is an international company launching a product in a professional setting. Again, I don't quite know why this bothers me so much, but I feel its within the context of other cultural things I experience.
Except it doesn’t.
"You need X?" works in a casual setting. But IMHO it looks pretty out of place in a more formal sentence like this with so many fancy nouns.
If I can read the text and guess what language the original text was in, I would argue that it's not a very good translation.
You can have a big brown bag, but if you have a brown big bag, something sounds wrong. You can have an excellent blueberry muffin, but not a blueberry excellent muffin. You can meet your 27-year-old Ukrainian friend, but not your Ukrainian 27-year-old friend.
Unless you majored in linguistics or learned English as a second language, you probably never once even thought about the rules of adjective order in English (and in other languages the rules are often different!). But you know them, follow them, and people who don't follow them don't sound right to native English speakers.
And there are so many weird rules like this.
This is like ranting about Microsoft's website using American spelling when clearly they're selling to British people as well, only worse. This is pretty short-sighted. To OC, please keep thoughts like this to yourself. I hope you're not doing this for all the different stylistic usages of English out there, otherwise things are not looking good for literally any Australian business.
Or to put it more abruptly - if the release marketing is so low effort they haven't even bothered to get a professional translation, it suggests the same care and attention may have been lavished on the product.
Not seen a 3D printer in the "middle of Lidl" yet but I expect to.
Having worked with them, I can assure you, it's gonna be a disaster. I've been called into a project as a consultant, and it took them over 3 months to even get any credentials for VPN, let alone repositories.
I just can't see this working out in any shape or form.
What you're saying is, you can just join, get paid, and do nothing? Where do I sign up?
proof IT with STACKIT!"
This is some first-class Denglish here to begin with, but because of the wrap on the hyphenation it took me a while to realize they were not suggesting we "proof IT" nor stealing the grammar from Fridays For Future.
> Start your journey into digital transformation with our powerful cloud and colocation solutions.
Maybe their target market is companies that are not yet using computers?
Also, I love that one of their references is... Schwarz Group. And another one is owned by... wait for it... Schwarz Group. Which leaves one consulting company that I vaguely suspect might have some non-STACKIT relationship with Schwarz Group. References, check! /s
Sometimes people will post a React template on HN with the title "How to Build Twitter."
I have no clue why IBM cloud has such a poor market position considering how dominant of a business it was. But there is still hope. A combined forces attempt could be a viable strategy.
Snowflake has changed cloud service providers several times to my knowledge. In my opinion their offering and business philosophy is unique to allow themselves to venture into this business.
For government backed cloud you have Alibaba cloud as an example. Regional cloud service peovider with government funding or active monitoring is an evetuality in my opinion. The Ukraine situation proves my point. Keep an eye out on India for this. I feel like the govt is gonna give it a shot before 2030. The reason behind this deserves its own article.
All you really need to start competing with AWS is a data center and a shiny dashboard. They already had the data center for their own use, so extending it to provide IT services is quite a logical next step.
Granted, STACKIT isn't as complete an offering like Open Telekom Cloud, but it's close enough to matter.
I tell interviewers that I don't use AWS or GCP because I don't need to use it. I use my RPI where I can use docker/virtual environment, SSH/SFTP, use it as a NAS but it is always a hard sell. In the last 5 years the term "Linux Experience" has been switched to "AWS Experience" yet they require exact same skill set! The only issue is that billing dashboard. But beyond that I wonder, has things really changed.
It also didn't help that they seemed intent on paying 35+% less than other competing tech companies.
My sentiment is that IBM Cloud should be broken down to smaller distinct ventures and hiring visionary leaders at each ventures. Like government, enterprise, Small Business+Startup+Open Source etc.
They got incredibly lazy.
> Simple pricing models
> Complete cost transparency
> Verbrauchsorientierte Abrechnung
Followed by "from X" pricing with zero further information.
In all fairness, this move makes sense to monetize any surplus they have in DC capacity. In terms of competition, their offering competes more with Equinix and the like than with AWS.
from 299.00€/month
Very impressive, yeah. 2 TB of traffic for ~22 servers for 300 EUR and they lock-in you for 36 months of contract. I think I'd better opt-out.
Lidl are part of the Schwarz Group.
"The Schwarz Group consists of the well-known brands Lidl and Kaufland, as well as Schwarz Produktion and waste and recycling management companies."
This is one of several companies in Germany reluctant to host with the existing US based cloud providers. So, they decided to use off the shelf software (openstack probably) and stick it on computers in data centers that they own. That's of course not an alternative to AWS other than that it is a self-hosted cloud and as such an alternative to not self-hosting it. Nothing wrong with self hosting stuff. Lots of companies do that for all sorts of reasons. White labeling it and selling your self hosted cloud to others is also not that uncommon. There's an enormous long tail of data centers that do exactly that. Lidl is big enough that they probably could justify spending a little extra on hardware and doing a little side business with like minded German companies.
It's a weird side effect of a lot of relatively large companies in Germany that are effectively family owned businesses that just became very large over time that don't like the idea of not being in control of their own assets and infrastructure. They are old fashioned, don't like change, and not very flexible.
The added dimension here in Germany is that a lot of these companies have yet to modernize their IT and are relatively clueless on that front. Lidl would be a good example of such a company. And not for a lack of trying. They are the same company that botched their deal with SAP after spending half a billion on them by insisting on so many customizations that the project just never shipped and they pulled the plug. They want custom everything and they ask for stuff they think they need without understanding their own needs. It's a combination of stubbornness, arrogance and corporate stupidity. That same reflex is driving them to do this. They could probably have saved quite a bit of money by just using existing cloud services.
I actually have to deal with this sentiment as we are based in Germany with our company. A lot of Germans are mildly psychotic/irrational about things in the cloud. I've met Germans that insist that financial service can't be hosted in AWS. Horse shit of course, many banks in Germany do exactly that and Amazon has a nice data center in Frankfurt for that. It's one of their main sites in Europe as it is a big market and they'll comply with whatever to keep that business going.
Google Cloud is currently what we host on because it is good, cheap, and easy to use. But we have customers that don't like that at all and we are looking into dedicated setups for these customers on various German providers. They'll get the same stuff at a great premium that we will charge them for without any shame. These services are typically more expensive, harder to use, less reliable, and more poorly supported. There is no upside other than the "hosted in Germany" thing. Pay more for way less. Their choice but a huge PITA for our operations.
My bad, I took the title from this thread¹ from 2 years ago which mentions that Lidl is planning to launch AWS competitor.
You are correct about German companies distrusting mainstream cloud providers. I guess the target audience for Stackit is mostly those German Mittelstands. I work with German corps and they would definitely have a mainstream provider with someone reliable like Lidl as a backer. In once case we found out the Google Analytics is storing the data in US centers by default and that made a lot of people deeply unhappy. I do have doubts that they might fall short of delivering their goal, but it is indeed an interesting development.
Ehh WHAT? That's not really usable.
[Edit] Looks like yes to both.
Looking at you Hetzner.
1) AWS has very serious regulatory capture in Europe - e.g. for banking, government, possibly else it is the only one approved solution.
2) Those pension-fund owned German enterprises are legendary bad at IT. The best way you could describe the culture there is anti-agile & anti-meritocratic.
I would hope that for a retail business like Lidl, far less than 1% of the revenue goes into IT staffing and systems costs. I worry that the number is closer to 10%.
I understand there are currently supply issues but the Aldi across the street from one of the Lidl locations isn't having this severe of an issue. The traditional grocery store chains in the area also don't seem to be having anywhere near the same level of supply issues even for their store brands.