I don't think UBI would give me the quality of life I'd like, but it would definitely help me carve out & spend more seasons & years of my life doing the really really ultra-high grade important & hopeful Personal Computing Revolution shit I want to get up to.
Seems to me there needs to be some more constraints on the idea to be realistic.
Maybe Strategic Basic Income? Eg: Executive branch gets coal miners on it for X years to let them retrain to work in another industry?
Or Universal Income Grant? Everyone gets X years no questions asked, you choose when to check them out. When you run out, sucks to be you.
I'd much rather have that last one as an option than UBI that's not going to motivate me to do anything by removing the natural urgency of scarcity. When everything is abundant and easy, why change?
Also if you believe most work is now bullshit jobs, and a lot of UBI-ers will be say giving their kids, parents, etc. more time and care, then this kind of directs money away from BS towards non-BS. For example BS is another say VP of internet junk food delivery marketing, whose top customer is the VC funneling printed money. Non-BS is someone growing veggies because they have the time, and chatting to the 80 year old next door who loves the company.
If it was $20,000 USD, then a 1 bedroom apartment (theoretically shared between 2 cohabitating people) would run $40,000/12/3 = $1,111/month on average when companies set a requirement of needing 3 times your rent in income.
That would leave the layabout small 2 person family about $2,200/month for food, fun and other expenses, and then there would be an incentive for them to have children as each child would add $20,000/yr to their income, allowing giving birth to be an effective means of upward mobility up to a certain point.
But I prefer to work part time on simple non-prestigious jobs, to fill my needs, to be independent, and all other time work on future projects.
This is not only question of pride, but this is absolutely other view on world.
And I could only be responsible for my own behavior. For others, I know from experience, that large percent of people play fair, but not all, and need some measures against those people, who don't want to play fair. Who interested, google free-rider problem.
Inflation is a whole other story, but it's controlled by the federal reserve. Generally the goal of the Fed is to keep unemployment low and prevent recessions. Inflation is a tool. Economy isn't about gold or cash or value of that cash; it's about GDP and political stability. When inflation increases, people spend money rather than storing it, fueling more growth. When growth is healthy, they bring inflation back down to close to 0%. So the Fed can stimulate the economy by printing more money. Inflation hurts, but it's all on purpose, a stick that predictably move the donkeys.
UBI... makes the concept of unemployment weird, but it serves the purpose of making things more stable.
If the UBI was enough to provide a good standard of living, it wouldn't remain that way for long as the inflation would hit incredibly hard probably very quickly.
These questions posed about UBI never fail to promise the impossible (your ultimate happiness/freedom) in exchange for something equally impossible (a basic income sufficient to meet even the most austere of needs).
I yawn.
I was happy serving burgers at McDonald’s. I took pride in making a good sandwich.
Now I’m happy in tech. I would never want to not work in tech.
It's not a dream I'm working towards it just slow.
The music project I'm working on right now requires significant investments in time and effort. A considerable weight would lift off of my shoulders if I didn't have to think about being able to pay my rent and food.
Eventually I let go of that, and found life much more peaceful and less strained.
Admittedly of late, it’s creeping back somewhat (old habits I suppose), but nothing like it was.