One nice upside of using this in-situ is that it cleans surfaces just as much as it cleans the air. So just using this in the ducts / air filters is not as effective.
One nice upside of using this in-situ is that it cleans surfaces just as much as it cleans the air. So just using this in the ducts / air filters is not as effective.
> ... far-UVC light has a range in biological materials of less than a few micrometers, and thus it cannot reach living human cells in the skin or eyes, being absorbed in the skin stratum corneum or the ocular tear layer.
The ocular tear layer, according to 30s of googling, is just the wet layer over your eyes (the stuff that turns into tears when you produce to much of it). So the idea is that this is eye-safe because the radiation gets absorbed by the small layer of wetness on your eyes.
It's described why it is eye-safe in literally the same diagram.