Let's make it a place for civilized discourse instead... shall we?
Let's make it a place for civilized discourse instead... shall we?
PS there was an actual point there. You can disagree if you want I guess, but meta discussions are always stupid - post the disagreement instead.
What was it?
Not that I would claim I always manage to instill poigniancy into my jibes.
(Yes, I know, subjective, blah blah blah. I don't care.)
The problem with sarcasm is that it insulates you from having to make an argument yourself. All you have to do is mimic your opponent and make them sound ridiculous. It's almost inherently a straw man fallacy unless it is exceptionally careful.
If you can't use sarcasm you're forced to state what you believe in positive terms, which makes for much more fruitful discussion. It's like the "passive voice" of argumentation. There are some cases where you just have to, but your writing gets better if you categorically avoid it.