Show HN: It is pants or shorts weather?
skorotkiewicz.github.io
skorotkiewicz.github.io
It stuck with me as a nearly perfect way to convey this information instead of burdening the visitor with the job of translating average temperature and rainfall data into what to pack. And it needs virtually no translation to other languages.
https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2020/01/why-some-...
The reason I do it is simple: It feels better. If I bundle up I end up being super comfortable but get really sleepy when I get back inside. Going out in the minimum not-in-pain clothing leaves me feeling energized.
Biggest problem ended up being all the soaked through clothes when I stopped. Instant omgsocoldwtfamidoing. But while you’re moving it’s great, you can even run faster than normal because heat dissipation is one of the biggest limiting factors in workout performance.
And yeah, you need to layer up or get inside as soon as you stop or you'll start shivering.
I prefer running in the cold, it feels great. Never thought I'd be Calvin's dad but here we are: https://picayune.uclick.com/comics/ch/1993/ch930101.gif
Shorts and Netflix, right?
Based on the url I'm guessing the developer is Polish, which I would expect to get warm enough for 13C to be culturally considered pants weather, but what do I know.
I come from a more continental-climate-area in the US so I'm used to a range of temperatures from -15C to 35C. I just can't imagine wearing shorts under 15C unless I am exercising or indoors.
I live on a 17th century farm which is heated by a wood-burning stove and a wood-burning kitchen stove. While it is quite possible to make it too hot for comfort inside (record is 27°C inside with -20°C outside, the result of adding a bit too much wood to the fire while leaving the ash door open) the inside temperature usually lies somewhere between 16°C and 18°C, in the morning often around 12°C. Having a lower inside temperature makes for a smaller temperature difference between inside and outside. This in turn makes for less of a cold shock when going out.
Humans are, to a certain degree, more sensitive to temperature differences than to absolute temperature. If it is 17°C inside that 15°C outside can feel quite balmy. If it is 23°C inside those same 15°C feel quite chilly.
Source: Australian, 1c today and it’s shorts weather.
How in the hell is Google worse than a random GitHub project?!
Bigger issue though is in the US we're still dumb and use F but the data is shown in C. 12C means nothing to me. 12c = 53.6F though which is above 50F which is my criteria for shorts, of which I'm wearing right now yet it tells me pants. Still neat idea though, but add Fahrenheit please :)
Edit: 27 minutes after posting this comment I refreshed and I see Fahrenheit. Thank you! :)
Checking the site's source directly, it even conflicts within itself. Whatchagonnado?
Looking at the comments I suspect they have a Boolean issue in the code somewhere
I think the author loves to wear pants whenever it’s not painful.
For me it showed 79F and sunny as 'pants weather' (my Feels Like temp is 87F), I'm not sure I fully endorse this algorithm.
Olisipo?!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olisipo says '... the ancient name of modern-day Lisbon while part of the Roman Empire.'
Aha, learned something new today! Strange that it gives me a name that was used two thousand years ago? What service is used to convert ip addresses to geo location?
That, plus it thinks 12C is shorts weather!
https://github.com/skorotkiewicz/pants-or-shorts/blob/main/s...
It was 18c a few days ago and last 2 days it has been nonstop snowing.
> It's Pants Weather
Hmm