Made a submission about it (the data) here (before I found this submission): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30810275
Made a submission about it (the data) here (before I found this submission): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30810275
So lets not go to the actual source and go to the link which claims to also be real?
If someone wants to centralize these, cool (Is it the NSA doing it for Unit 8200 or maybe you are Fancy Bear?) But how about we start at the source before going straight to dumbing it down.
ddosecrets - "There are a number of datasets <> that we've received and declined to publish for various reasons <> we do not acknowledge rejected datasets."
Given this is 8 parts, how would we know that ddosecrets hasn't cut stuff out?
It's not dumbing down to link directly to a trusted source of the data itself. Feel free to use both sources, like I did. But if you want to avoid Twitter and the videos anonymous usually bundles with their announcements, DDoS is a good distraction free source.
@latestanonpress is not the actual source, every single “anonymous” twitter account is run by a different idiot.