Separate reply for a separate topic.
> If you were in charge of hiring people, would you never hire anyone who was pro-military? You putting money in their pocket is enriching them to help further their views which are oh-so-terrible. This type of thinking gets really bad, really fast, and it's not something we want to promote.
With the exception of those who are military veterans, who are a protected class in the United States for purposes of hiring (it's actually illegal to discriminate against them on that basis), yes, I can and do actively avoid hiring anyone pro-military who is not presently (and has not been) actually in the military (which is the maximum extent permitted by law).
There's no injustice in discrimination for purposes of association when such discrimination is based on the informed, adult choices of a person (as opposed to someone's inbuilt traits, which they have no control over). We rightfully discriminate during hiring based on whether or not someone chose to attend university, whether or not someone chooses to espouse racist views, whether or not someone chooses to use or avoid certain technologies, whether or not someone has chosen to develop (or not) their social skills, whether or not someone chooses to move to the location of the proposed job offer. These are great and useful.
Freedom of association is one of our most powerful tools for improving society (both in the macro, as well as in the micro, such as in a company or organization). We don't owe anyone our time or attention or association (or YouTube views) if we don't agree with the kind of world they're trying to build.
It also makes for a nicer workplace when you opt to avoid hiring people who are racist, or pro-violence, or anti-human-rights, or anti-equal-application-of-the-law, or any manner of a big list of optional adult choices that tell you a lot about a person's thinking (or lack thereof) about the world around them.
(Before the straw man argument: this is not an argument for hiring people who are "just like me", or only who share my views, or an embracing of the status quo, or any of the other obvious traps that are endemic in hiring. This is an argument for exercising judgement on specific constrained topics which should be universal in a civilized culture and unfortunately are nowhere near universal in our current culture.)
If I am advocating for anything, it is to discriminate more using your own criteria to build a better world, however you see best to do that. It's fine if you have different opinions from me (maybe you want to prefer hiring military promoters or something?), the point is that we should be making these choices more consciously to steer society in the right directions.
These are mine. Yours will be different. Choose to be a moral person, and do what is right. We'll all get there together eventually, because there are vastly more of us who don't want violence (or violent ideologies) in our societies.