Hacker News Reader

So introducing a catalyst to a stable reaction and then not attributing the increased reaction rates to the catalyst...

You’re coming across like you’re trying to miss the point. The entire article is attributing increased reaction rates to the pandemic.

>You’re coming across like you’re trying to miss the point.

My response needs to be read as a response to nautilius's attempt to interpret psychlops' root comment.

Yeah, that still doesn't change that impression, though.

I don't understand. My comment is to show that a catalyst can be a cause. How is everyone else reading it?