>> and nobody bats an eye.
Because most people in crypto are utterly convinced that their "investment" of $1000 in crypto will become $100k or even $1M in no time.. so the 0.5% seems negligible.
Because most people in crypto are utterly convinced that their "investment" of $1000 in crypto will become $100k or even $1M in no time.. so the 0.5% seems negligible.
[citation needed]
Matt Damon says line goes up, you coward!
Cryptocurrency is not practical without access to a bank.
> inflation at all time highs
Cryptocurrency's extreme volatility means it's a poor hedge against inflation, especially compared to other assets that are known to be reliable without the volatility. For example, if you bought BTC a year ago hoping to hedge against the alarm bells that were sounding for inflation, you are now doing much worse compared to havin done absolutely nothing.
> dollar possibly losing de facto monopoly in world trade.
This is not a real use-case. Could this happen? Perhaps, but there's no reason to believe that this wouldn't decimate the cryptocurrency markets, if anything, the new reserve currency would be the more desirable asset, not cryptocurrency.
Also, BTC has been used without a bank since inception – not sure what you mean by "practical".
This logic could be applied to anything.
> Also, BTC has been used without a bank since inception – not sure what you mean by "practical".
Acquiring bitcoin without a bank is not practical, without a bank you essentially have to orchestrate an in-person meetup to exchange cash for cryptocurrency, and this raises many safety concerns besides being a very inconvenient burden. You also need a bank to turn BTC into spendable money, same problem applies.