It's so absolutely bizarre to announce something at this stage. I wonder what is prompting it.
It's so absolutely bizarre to announce something at this stage. I wonder what is prompting it.
Instead of building something and then cancelling it later when it doesn't gain traction to get their PR win, they decide to cash in on the PR win upfront with a big partnership announcement, then cancel the product before building it if it doesn't gain sufficient traction, thus saving on engineering costs and streamlining the typical Google technical offering lifecycle.
Behind the scenes, Google usually gives the partnering company some pretty nice discounts. Usually no one does any engineering until someone else sees the PR and also wants in on this "exciting new feature" and they're the one actually beta testing the product that they thought the announced companies already used.
This new effort is a response to regulation in markets around the world like South Korea [1] and the Netherlands [2]
[1] https://www.theverge.com/2021/11/4/22763040/google-in-app-pu....
[2] https://www.theverge.com/2021/12/24/22852966/apple-netherlan...
This is 100% a defense against antitrust investigations happening across the country.
It doesn't matter that users don't care, that they may never roll it out, or that it may never roll out beyond Spotify. Promises are free -- they can make as many promises as they want to try to blunt the inevitable litigation.
In return, they're getting one fewer enemy. I wouldn't be surprised if they try to pick up the other major developers antagonizing the app stores, like Match Group and Epic, using the same tactic.
Unfortunately, this shows even more dedication to the monopoly -- it's not dissimilar from dictators who allow their political opponents to live to make it seem like there's a democracy.