Maybe. Almost everyone follows the same standard (some version of ICD, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd10.htm) of coding. If it's much better outside the US I'd be surprised, though. The standard is a mess of strange, super-specific things (e.g. ICD10 code W56.52XA is "struck by other fish, initial encounter") that aren't useful for any purpose, and in practice is used mainly for billing (insurance or otherwise).
I'm fond of W59.22XA, "struck by turtle - initial encounter" aka the Aeschylus ICD code
You know, I have never really given EMR’s in other countries much thought and I’m now super curious how implementation has gone, what some good examples are, etc.
Epic expanded into the Nordics and their providers found it disastrous on the whole, mostly because it's designed for the US healthcare system and therefore cares almost exclusively about billing, which is completely irrelevant for them. See https://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/06/epic-denmark-healt...