Which seems to be a version of just arbitrarily choosing a candidate that you wanted to hire(for diversity purposes), but who wouldn't normally meet the criteria.
Which seems to be a version of just arbitrarily choosing a candidate that you wanted to hire(for diversity purposes), but who wouldn't normally meet the criteria.
He observes (correctly) that poverty is one of the strongest drivers of exclusion, which is a nice political trope, but then ignores that idea going further with his model of talent distributed randomly to spherical cows.
Well, guess what, talent is not distributed randomly, the way people get exceptional in one of their dimensions is by practicing and developing it. When a series of great filters are applied beginning in kindergarten for some people based on some factor of race, class, gender etc., they will not have ever had the chance to develop relevant aptitudes and will always look flat no matter what projection you apply to their sphere.
"...What this suggests to me is that there are a huge number of ways of being a great physicist and that in turn suggests there are many ways of being a great physicist that we haven’t seen yet. Diversity is critical to the future of physics, I believe, because it is imperative to explore this vast space of physics talent and that means encouraging people who are different and who think and act differently..."