India unveils world’s cheapest tablet computer for $35
ft.com
ft.com
My comment a year ago: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1600780
Same thing. 'unveiling' a tablet for a price is nothing until a tablet is actually sold for that price on the market. This times two in a place like India, which is plans-heavy and implementation-light. This really doesn't mean much.
If they can only fix their corruption, bureaucracy and the totally broken governmental system, thousands of entrepreneurs can emerge and create millions of gadgets...
If India now creates a national or city wide free wifi network, their economy would skyrocket in the next two decades.
May be those who come out of such an education system will know better than working within a corrupt, bureaucratic and broken system.
Subsidized government programs exist because this is where the market fails and governments have a larger and more important mission than just maximizing profits and putting on fancy keynotes for drooling fans.
GDP per capita is around $1300 precisely because the governmnet always felt it had a LARGER and MORE important mission than (simply doing their job with no corruption). And these larger and more important missions almost always end up channeling tax payer's money into politicians via some crazy project like this
While corruption in socialism is bad, corruption in capitalism is just as bad. Even the most developed capitalist countries have failed to remove corruption. (hence the 2008 subprime crisis)
To India's credit, its socialist tendencies kept the country unaffected from 2008 subprime crisis.
No boom, no bust....
> While corruption in socialism is bad, corruption in capitalism is just as bad. Even the most developed capitalist countries have failed to remove corruption. (hence the 2008 subprime crisis)
The 2008 "subprime crisis" wasn't capitalist corruption, it was govt corruption. The US govt decided to subsidize home ownership via various means, which created a property bubble. Bubbles eventually pop, and the govt then decided to "socialize" the losses and try to restore the bubble.
The Irish govt went one step further - it decided to guarantee all bank losses.
That's not capitalism.
This snippet from the Wikipedia entry for capitalism synthesizes it pretty well: "Classical liberals such as Mises, Rand, and Rothbard define capitalism as a market system with no interference by States (laissez faire). Some define capitalism as a system governed by capital accumulation regardless of the legal ownership titles."
anamax is referring to what could be referred to "classical capitalism," while you, ramchip, seem to be referring to "state capitalism".
I meant to say India was unaffected from 'global recession'. Obviously there was no housing bubble in India.
"...it was govt corruption."
You mean in a crony-capitalism govt alone is guilty? How?
Things are bad enough for the vast majority. If left to the "market" 3/4 of the population would be starving.
By the way, there is no such thing as government without corruption. There is always corruption. Always.
Also, if this device proves to be the best way to deliver essential public services (e.g. education, tele-medicine, etc.), it most certainly is the job of the government to make tablets. If this is a platform on which people can innovate and build apps on top of, it is not a stretch to compare this to US federal funding of basic science.
But I've always wondered, what came first, the corrupt government, or citizens who don't pay tax?
I see the same thing in Greece. The government is corrupt, but the people don't pay taxes.
Does the government become corrupt because there isn't enough money to pay civil servants, or does do people refuse to pay taxes because they will be misused by a corrupt government?
First announcement: "we'll do it".
Status update: "as announced it is on course and will be completed 'soon'".
Launch: "as promised here it is for the public".
Media just publishes each statement as major news item and people feel it's already overrated.
Will be available for purchase in November.
The specs are:
Android 2.2
Wifi, 2 USB Ports
7'' resistive display, 350g
366 mhz processor
256 mb RAM
2GB flash
microsd support
2100 mah battery
can play 1080p video
This is a big surprise to me given the low specs. Can it do this well?
Without a keyboard you cannot create. (Ok you can draw imprecise pictures and type really slowly)
Without creating/doing you are not learning. You are just absorbing data.
Tablet/touch screen users never add new content to the world, they are just an audience.
Granted, a seven-inch screen will make it harder. But for creation of content there's always actual paper and pencil. They can keep doing whatever they're already doing in that regard. And if they can't now, there's at least the theoretical ability to attach a keyboard.
The way I see it, the first goal is to be a lighter, more flexible textbook. This is exactly content consumption. It will likely do a good job of this. If it does anything else as well, that's a bonus.
Is this device shipping at the claimed price right now or not?
My bad. Downvote me to oblivion.
And yes, rural electrification is a huge challenge, but it's much easier to deploy a solar panel per school , to power some tens/hundreds of low power tablets.
A plywood car might suck some of the perceived stigma off the nano.
Perhaps though, it's time to think about alternatives to building yet more 4 wheeled polluters, though it's morally hard to tell Indians that they should stick with their scooters.
Cheap in price is in general associated with cheap in quality as well - market psychology. People buy it only when they feel it is good enough. Nano having been already branded and popularized as cheap in price got severely damaged by a few glitches and got rebranded as cheap in quality.
Essentially, production delays and a few unpopular news items made people reconsider their choices and before Nano could recover the market is filled with cars in the small segment made by Honda (who thought of a Honda car in small segment), Maruti/Suzuki, Ford, Hyundai...etc. Also remember that it was Nano which spawned a new generation of small segment cars by various manufacturers who would otherwise have not considered the option at all.
Seriously, I hope this gets put to good use by schools for textbooks too.
Boys will be boys.