You, your parents, and the hotness of who you marry
dynomight.net
dynomight.net
Some of the reasons for that are fairly obvious e.g. if you're healthy, your brain works better.
But beyond that, this sort of selection isn't just occuring in dating. You're more likely to get a job, have a solid friendship group, be received better by strangers, etc, if you're more attractive.
It's a feedback loop, particularly for women.
I'm sure you can find a few outliers, like say pre-hair-transplant Elon or whatever. They're still not actually _ugly_ for the most part though.
In short, hotness's strongest correlation was in women's pickiness; the more attractive the woman, the pickier she is. This remained true regardless of other factors that we would predict to matter (e.g., age, income...).
Men's attractiveness did not influence their pickiness.
Eva Illouz would point out that interest in "hotness" is culturally determined. For instance:
There is a proliferation of images of "hot" people; a person in 1722 did not see as many "hot" people as today. "hot" people appear in advertising, storytelling, pornography, etc.
Illouz thinks it is a bad idea that you'd select a mate based on a temporary feeling of being overwhelmed by attraction for them.
I feel like you are begging the question, but I'll bite.
* hourglass shape (although the dimensions vary the proportions stay attractive) in women * tallness and muscles in men * symmetrical features * clear skin (no patches or spots) * healthy, strong hair * straight, complete teeth * limbal rings * ...
All these are basic biological fitness markers for youth, virility, nutrition and overall health. E.g. symmetry is a very powerful one and is known as a proxy for a healthy and well fed mother during pregnancy.
Those biologically (as far as we know) universally attractive features are not contradictory to cultural preferences (which often are basically status markers), rather these go hand in hand. And they are instant, basically unavoidable and exist in more or less all cultures. E.g. limbal rings and symmetry are immensely easy to test and have been demonstrated in hundreds of studies across cultures, not just WEIRD people.
In online dating for instance the sheer volume of persons sampled requires the participant to make a quick cut based on looks, creates an illusion that there is more choice than there is which causes people to delay making a decision.
If I was advising a friend, my head would rule: I’d tell them that while attractiveness is nice to have, they should prioritise other aspects (values, temperament, etc.) in choosing someone to be happy with in the long term. I have no vested interest in how attractive my friend’s partner is - only in their happiness.
But when making a choice for myself, heart (or raging hormones?) plays a much bigger role, and attractiveness is prioritised much higher, especially at first. And I do (obviously) have a vested interest in optimising for the attractiveness of my partner, all else being equal.
Regardless of this recent phenomenon I think younger people generally have always prioritized feelings when choosing a mate. So it may not have strictly been physical attractivenes as measured today but more the holistic cultural attractiveness of the time period.
I do think that parents can make a wiser choice because their feelings have been tempered with time and thus are not as influenced by feelings and this quality of attractiveness. They can take a more detached and logical approach of the qualities that would make a good long-term mate. Of which feelings are a part of it but of all the things that come together for successful bonding personal feelings are among the most malleable things there are.
A person who gives you the butterflies in your stomach and makes you feel attractive this week may not be the same person next week or in 5 years. Because attractiveness is also culturally based it is something that can be learned and relearned. Since this is completely within your own self it is your own power to control and relearn and adapt.
There are many more things that go into the relationship you have no power to control. Such as is the person good and honorable. Because despite what we may want time and time again it's shown people rarely can change their core value system. So if a person is not an honest and honorable person in tiny details it is unlikely that they will ever become that for anyone else. We can only look through recent times and throughout all history where we find people curiously attracted to hotness of abusive people. They continually make the cry but they love me and they'll change for me but how often does that really happen.
These are the qualities that young people are blinded to because of the emotion and the feeling or that hotness as listed here is their primary quality they're looking at. All it takes is someone to look around when a culture has decided what makes something hot or physically attractive you will quickly see the men adapt to that and peacock around as that thing whatever it is. If it's having no job and being a grunge bum but wearing nice clothes that you scammed off someone that's what you'll see a whole lot of. If it's wealth and security of lifestyle you will see men move toward that. It is only the nature of things.
I don’t think that’s recent.
I don’t think that’s recent. Unless you mean “since 1970”
Being the best at scamming or gaining wealth may not be a worthy goal, but it shows you can be good at something. Merely being able to become good enough at something to beat out 90 or 99% of the population who are actively trying to achieve the same ends, may not be completely reliable but it's not a bad indicator to find someone who can at least adapt and execute well which is a pretty good indicator of someone with the skills to ensure survival of their family (even if it means in the future the needs for survival change completely).
If I had to bet on who could be the more successful software engineer for instance, I'd place my bet on the best scammer before a mediocre CS grad. I think human attractiveness has a sort of innate understanding that the task isn't so much that matters as seeing who can adapt and succeed at mastering and being the best at tasks.
But tell that to a young person...