After reading your comment I looked at the original post with a view to identifying its basic perspective.
https://www.motionmountain.net/9lines.html was clearly not written by a physicist, as it includes the line "The nine lines contain physics, chemistry, material science, biology, medicine, geology, astronomy, engineering and computer science. It appears that the nine lines contain all natural sciences!" which is not a physics type of statement.
Obviously, physics contains everything, just the way "bits contain all software". Observing that doesn't make someone a programmer, in my opinion.
Why stop at physics, chemistry, material science, biology, medicine, geology, astronomy, engineering and computer science (list provided).
A physicist could correctly state:
"Physics contains all aspects of chemistry, Earth science / Geology, Oceanography/ marine science, Meteorology, astronomy, biology, molecular interactions, physiological mechanisms, evolution, botany / plant science(s), Zoology, Ecology, etc."
However, it is kind of like saying text comprises all of the words of Shakespeare. Well, sure, but that doesn't mean that you get Shakespearean criticism from writing a text editor. It's two different fields.
The author has an interesting outsider view shown in https://www.motionmountain.net/9lines.html
However, the lines "Isn't this incredible?" and "Enjoy searching for answers." are sarcastic and disrespectful to the work actual physicists put into their discipline for decades and the author should be ashamed for this tone.
If they want to be a physicist they should observe and learn from physicists at every opportunity. (I'm not one, by the way.)
Ignoring the rude sarcasm, we can correctly summarize the document as "Physics governs everything. Period."
It's not a physics document. It is (or rather ought to be) a tribute to physicists and the unbreakable laws of physics.