(2016?)

Also:

> First wave: Handcrafted knowledge

> Second wave: Statistical learning

> Third wave: Contextual adaptation

I understood clearly enough the first two, but the slides become increasingly ambiguous and fuzzy towards the end; and it seems to me they are mixing up a bunch of not self-evidently related desiderata.

It is not immediate, for instance, that small "generative" models that are easy to interpret necessarily lead to better "abstraction" (whatever that means). And whatever this all has to do with "contextual adaptation" is to me anyone's guess.

Highly alarming (but sadly, from experience, unsurprising) to see such fuzzy position document from such an important funding agency for AI.