Well, again, the author is arguing (correctly in my view) that this is understandable but incompatible with the baseline expectations of the community. It’s a basic principle of open source that you won’t go out of your way to stop people from using your code, and a project which tries to prevent all Russian citizens from using it is straightforwardly not “open source” by the OSI definition.
It’s the copyright holder who gets to decide, not the OSI.
I feel like you're just skipping over the meat of my comments to get in quick zingers and I'm not interested in engaging with that style of conversation any longer. Sorry.