Such move is harmful for the society and must end before it's too late. We must came back to classic desktop computing and punishing all evolution that try to lock users. Modern web(cr)apps fall in this very category.
It's very asinine for instance forcing people's on crappy bloated banking portals instead of agree around a common and standard API (like SEPA OpenBank) leaving users using their favorite local app where all transactions are locally stored, digitally signed by the bank so source of truth in user hand, always available, with as many banks as users want under a common user-chosen UI. No need for crappy monsters WebVM, no need for gazillion of resources just to keep pushing around garbage mostly used for surveillance. The same apply to taxes and pretty anything else.
Personally I like reading post with Firefox reader just to avoid being distracted by the crap added to most websites, if a website does not render in Reader or without js I simply avoid it.
It also walls an increasing amount of the web off from those of us who reject JS because of the security risks it brings.
I'd actually say it's good engineering.
If I engineer a small gas can (for filling my lawn mower) I can build one that holds a gallon, or one that holds 5 gallons. Now 2% of the population that owns lawn mowers have massive yards and riding mowers. So which one do I engineer? Which do I build. I build for the 98%
Optimist says cup is half full
Pessimist says cup is half empty
Engineer says cup is twice the size it has to be.
The reality. Building for the 2% just isn't an effective use of resources.
-- Oh oh.. I got a better one..
-- How many bridges in your home town have allowance for horses. Are all the bridge builders bad engineers?