For some reason, Firefox (and its variants) seems to attract an especially tough crowd. People will let Chrome hoover up every last bit of information about you but FF will get relentlessly pilloried for every minor decision.
FF has historically been concerned with privacy and transparency. When they move contrary to that, people "hold them accountable" by issuing public critiques.
In comparison, I'm not sure that the Chromium project ever intended to have privacy as one of their forefront values.
Instead of ensuring their engine is easily modular and usable they are more concerned about others making competing browsers and thus let greed drive their design decisions to make a clunky and poorly architected product that just lags in development.
Fire the greed driven management of Mozilla, and bring a team more concerned about developing a good product than letting money drive the design decisions, and Firefox will be back on track.
We're lucky to have an alternative to the WebKit oligopoly. If you don't like Firefox, just stick with the other browsers and let the rest of us that are trying to prevent a monoculture continue our work.
I don't work for Mozilla or have ever done work on Firefox other than bugfixing, but I'll gladly run an alternative browser so the web doesn't end up stagnating like it did before.
I switched to Mozilla Gecko after Opera Presto was sold to a chinese firm and they switched engines to Chromium. After that, I have been using various Firefox forks since Firefox started bundling useless software and made really questionable decisions sacrificing user privacy for their greed. I am really glad that forks that respect the user, like LibreWolf and Tor browser, exists.
> The comments like this from people who will complain about everything are completely valueless.
I have given specifics. Your comment though is less useful.
> We're lucky to have an alternative to the WebKit oligopoly.
We are unlucky that the current management of Mozilla is slowly selling out on this, under the influence of Google and their own greed - 100's of millions of dollars and yet, making a modular browser engine is not a priority for them as that means more competition and innovation from other open and closed source developers that will threaten their cash cow.
I disagree. You list a number of random topics that are exaggerated and overblown, then attack the leadership of the organization personally and ascribe motivations that you have invented. Your comments are not useful for setting future direction of a browser, and you are contributing to a browser monoculture.
When we lose the only viable competitor to WebKit because you and other commenters hold Firefox to your unreachable standards, it will be a sad day.
I used to be happy with their output, many years ago. So yes, of course.
I haven't liked FF in a very long time. But I used to love it.
> I'll gladly run an alternative browser so the web doesn't end up stagnating like it did before.
The only thing actually stopping Google from completely owning the Web is Apple's mandating Safari's engine for all browsers on iOS. Firefox has been floundering for too long (a decade? More?) and no longer matters much, aside from providing some kind of value to Google. Microsoft's probably maneuvering to open a second front on that, despite using Google's engine now, unless they decide to team up with Google to go after Apple. FF has been an also-ran for years.
I for one was happy with the Firefox Mozilla produced years ago, yes.
I'm unfamiliar with these last two things. What code do they run? And what adware?
- Firefox’s address bar has ads now: https://www.theverge.com/2021/10/7/22715179/firefox-suggest-...
From the top of HN literally yesterday. They can match user downloads to multiple installs across systems now. The "solution" is to select "opt out of telemetry" in the settings, which you can't get to until after you've installed the browser and it's already happened.
Edit: It appears to be for the new-profile ping not the install pings.
Not making including a plugin required for a top 50 site would be user hostile, and I will die on this hill.
This is exactly the thing everyone else in the thread is pointing out as the issue, complaints from FOSS-or-nothing folks expecting to be catered to at the expense of the other (probably) 99% of potential users. The fact that it's even a plugin at all (that you can disable!), rather than an integrated part of the browser, is them already catering to that. Firefox already caters to this niche a ton, and nothing is good enough.