7.3 magnitude quake hits north Japan, tsunami alert issued
news.yahoo.com
news.yahoo.com
The meltdowns happened due to a primary cooling loop failure which in turn was caused by a loss of power to the primary coolant loop (because the backup diesel generators weren't located high enough above sea level to avoid being swamped by the tsunami).
Given the rhetoric about right now about the possibility of a nuclear exchange I wonder how many commercial nuclear plants would also melt down in the event of an EMP attack. I've always thought that nuclear as we have it is safe as long as the operators don't do anything aggressively dangerous but I'm thinking that any reactor that cannot passively keep itself below meltdown temperature is inherently unsafe and replacing them all with SMRs should be a public safety priority.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scram>
Edit: > the operators can inject solutions containing neutron poisons directly into the reactor coolant.
Neutron poison solutions are water-based solutions that contain chemicals that absorb neutrons,
such as common household borax, sodium polyborate, boric acid, or gadolinium nitrate,
causing a decrease in neutron multiplication, and thus shutting down the reactor without use of the control rods.
I admit that when they were able to power the pumps, that the only water they had was salt-water.
A very bad option!